- This topic has 72 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 6 days ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Instruction:
After reviewing and comparing your findings with those of other groups, discuss the following questions:
- What are your findings about the process of writing and submitting a scientific article? What common patterns can you identify when compared with other groups’ findings?
- Based on your interview results, what are the characteristics of a high-quality scientific article and the challenges authors often face? What common patterns can you identify when compared with other groups’ findings?
- From your experience interviewing the respondent, what understanding did you gain about the resources, support, or structural components that are important in writing a scientific article? What common patterns can you identify when compared with other groups’ findings?
1.When starting an article, start with a title that generates numerous references. Then, you need to delve deeper into the introduction and draw from published references.
2.You can check the article’s syntactic rating at sinta.kemdiktisaintek.go.id. Challenges faced by students include the difficulty of choosing an article title that generates numerous references, a maximum of 20% plagiarism, finding accurate references, and a lack of in-depth introductions for students both domestically and internationally.
3.The journal is the home of the article. When writing an article, many tools are permitted, such as Grammarly and Google Translate.
80% of the last five years are allowed.
A minimum of 20 references is required, and more is preferable.
The title should have 12 words,
a maximum of 15 pages, and
references in Indonesian-language articles are fine, but it’s better to look for them in foreign or English-language articles.1. When writing, it’s best to start with the Title, Method, and then the Introduction. The time depends on how well you understand the topic. If you’re submitting, the important thing is to check whether the topic is suitable for the journal and check for plagiarism. All groups agree that the structure of an article is the same. The only difference is how people start. Some people write smoothly because they have the material ready, while others take longer because they lack initial research.
2. A good article has clear research, a compelling title, and less than 20% plagiarism. The most common problem is not understanding the topic in depth. Many people want to be perfect right away, but writing is a process. All groups agree: a quality article isn’t just about a neat template, but also about how deeply we discuss the content.
3. Google Scholar is the primary application for finding references and citation methods. There should be a minimum of 20 references, and it should be about 12 pages long. Older references, or references older than 5 years, are still acceptable if they are the main theory. The bibliography must be consistent with what you’ve written to avoid plagiarism. In general, almost everyone now relies on Google Scholar.1. Writing a scientific article begins with identifying a research gap as a basic for research, then supporting it with relevant and up-to-date references. Authors also need to read extensively in journals to understand good writing standards. Then, they determine the title and methods to be used and the focus of the article’s content.
The article submission process goes through several stages: initial review by the editor, followed by assessment by reviewers, revision, and finally publication. This process is quite lengthy and usually requires several revisions.2. A quality scientific article has a clear research gap, complete references, a detailed methodology, and a systematic structure. Furthermore, its main strength lies in its content.
Challenges often faced by authors include the risk of plagiarism, difficulty identifying research gaps, inconsistencies between the title and methods, lack of methodological detail, academic language barriers (especially English), and low self-confidence.3. Authors need resources like Google Scholar to find references and tools like Google Translate to assist with language. Reading previous journals is also important as a reference.
The main components of an article include research gaps, references, methodology, writing structure, and correct citations. The role of editors and reviewers is crucial in improving the quality of articles through the evaluation and revision process.1. When you start writing an article, start by reading reference articles. After reading several references, start creating a title, determining the method, and writing an introduction.
2. High-quality articles will be ranked in terms of syntax, with a plagiarism rate of only 20%. Frequent challenges faced by writers include difficulty reducing plagiarism and a lack of understanding of the topic of the article to be published. While appropriate references may be found, there are limitations, such as not exceeding the five-year limit.
3. From the results of the respondent interviews, I learned that the journal is the home of articles, because many are still mixed up. When writing articles, we can use references from Google Scholar. To use references, it is better if there are at least 20 references. If more, it is better, and references older than 5 years are still acceptable. The maximum page length is 15 and the title writing is 12 words. But this can change depending on the conditions given.1. my findings on the writing and submission of scientific articles that the process of writing and submitting a scientific article usually begins by deciding on a title and then finding references that match the topic we want to study(the references should be relevant) reading journal articles is also important to understand proper academic writing and from there the title, method, and main focus of the article can be decided
2.a good scientific article usually has a clear research gap, enough references, and a clear explanation of the method.the structure also needs to be neat and easy to follow. Besides that the quality of the article really depends on how strong the content is.some challenges that authors often face are the risk of plagiarism, difficulty in finding a research gap, mismatch between the title and the method, lack of explanation in the methodology, problems with academic English
3.from my experience during the interview,i learn that articles and journals are not actually different rather the a journal functions as a platform or a (home) where scientific articles are published. in writing a scientific article authors need various supporting resources for example like Google Scholar are important for finding reliable references, and reading previous journal articles helps as a guideline and benchmark. In addition tools such as google translate can assist authors in dealing with language difficulties. i also learned that it is generally recommended to use references published within the last five years to ensure the information is up to date and relevant
1. From my findings, writing a scientific article starts with preparing a clear topic and following the journal’s structure. After submission, the article goes through a review by reviewers, and revision are often required. The waiting time varies, from a few months up to one or two years, depending on the journal. Authors can also contact the journal for updates.
Compared with other groups, the common pattern is that the process is long, involves multiple revisions, and the review stage us the most critical part.2. A high-quality article should have a clear and focused research, follow the journal’s template, match its scope, and have a low plagiarism level (below 20%).
Common challenge include rejection due to mismatch with the journal, weak structure (especially in the introduction), and high similarity levels.
Similar to other groups, both quality and acceptance depend on relevance, structure, and originality, and many authors struggle during revision.3. I learned that understanding the structure is very important. For example, an abstract must include the purpose, method,subject, results, and novelty. Following journal guidelines also helps ensure the article is acceptable.
Compared with other groups,mthe common pattern is that clear structure and following guidelines are essential for successful writing.1. The scientific article submission process requires patience as the waiting time for editor updates can take a year or more depending on the queue. This pattern aligns with other groups’ findings showing that publication duration is often unpredictable.
2. High-quality articles must have a clear research focus, a proper introduction, and a maximum plagiarism level of 20%. The main challenges often encountered are template non-compliance and improper introductory structure, a common pattern also found by other groups.
3. The most important structural component is an abstract that covers the objectives, methods, subjects, results, and novelty in a simple yet engaging way. This indicates a pattern where article effectiveness relies heavily on the author’s ability to present the research core concisely.1. the process of writing and submitting a scientific article requires patience, especially after submission. Authors may need to wait up to a year or even longer to receive updates from the editor, depending on the journal’s review queue. When compared with other groups’ findings, a common pattern is that the publication process is often time-consuming and influenced by factors such as reviewer availability and editorial workload.
2. From the interview results, a high-quality scientific article is determined by how well the research is focused, particularly whether the introduction is appropriate and clearly written, as well as whether the level of plagiarism does not exceed 20%. Common challenges faced by authors include rejection due to inappropriate formatting (not following the journal template), weak or unclear introductions, and high plagiarism levels. Similar to other groups’ findings, these issues frequently appear as the main reasons why articles fail to meet journal standards.
3. The interview also highlights that important components in writing a scientific article include clarity of structure and adherence to academic standards, especially in writing the abstract. A good abstract should clearly state the research objectives, methods, subjects, and results, and if possible, mention the novelty of the study. It should be concise and simpler compared to other sections. When compared with other groups’ findings, a common pattern is the emphasis on structured writing, clarity, and compliance with journal guidelines as key factors for successful publication.1. Based on the discussion and comparison with other groups, writing and submitting a scientific article involves several steps, such as preparing the manuscript based on the journal template, writing each section systematically, and submitting it to a suitable journal. After submission, the review process can take a long time, depending on the journal, reviewers, and submission queue. In some cases, authors may need to follow up with the editor. From other groups’ questions, it is also clear that writers need strategies to stay consistent, such as managing time and setting writing targets. The process may not always follow the initial plan, as changes can happen during writing. Overall, the publication process is complex, time-consuming, and requires patience and consistency.
2. From the discussion, a high-quality article should follow the journal template, have a clear structure (especially in the introduction), maintain low plagiarism, and stay focused on the research topic. A good abstract should include the purpose, method, results, and novelty in a concise way. A strong introduction should clearly explain the background, show the research gap, and state the research objectives. In terms of challenges, article rejection is common and usually caused by incorrect format, weak structure, or unfocused discussion. Another common issue is writer’s block, where authors struggle to start or continue writing. Overall, most challenges are related to technical issues and lack of preparation.
3. The discussion shows that understanding the structure of a scientific article is very important. Each section has a specific role. For example, the results section should present data clearly, while the conclusion should be brief and not include new information. Proper use of references is also important, especially when dealing with secondary citations. Writers need to understand how to cite correctly to avoid mistakes. In addition, tools such as journal templates, plagiarism checkers, and reference managers are helpful. The use of AI is also discussed, and it should be used carefully while following academic ethics. Support from lecturers, reviewers, and peers is also important. Overall, successful academic writing depends not only on individual skills but also on using the right resources, understanding the structure, and using technology wisely.
1. When writing a scientific article, first determine the topic, then conduct research and seek as many references as possible from journals.
From there, the author can determine the title and methodology for the article. After completing the article from beginning to end, it will go through a reviewer assessment process. Authors typically make multiple revisions to accommodate reviewer feedback. The revision process until publication can take quite a long time.2. A quality scientific article is typically structured according to the requirements, includes accurate data analysis, appropriate research methods, and references to articles within the last five years.
Common challenges faced by authors include inconsistencies in the method and title, limited vocabulary, and a lack of confidence.3. Authors must understand several tools available for writing scientific articles, such as Google Scholar. They must frequently consult journals and books for reference. Support from a supervisor is also crucial for improving the quality of their writing.
1. When writing a scientific article, first determine the topic, then conduct research and seek as many references as possible from journals.
From there, the author can determine the title and methodology for the article. After completing the article from beginning to end, it will go through a reviewer assessment process. Authors typically make multiple revisions to accommodate reviewer feedback. The revision process until publication can take quite a long time.2. A quality scientific article is typically structured according to the requirements, includes accurate data analysis, appropriate research methods, and references to articles within the last five years.
Common challenges faced by authors include inconsistencies in the method and title, limited vocabulary, and a lack of confidence.3. Authors must understand several tools available for writing scientific articles, such as Google Scholar. They must frequently consult journals and books for reference. Support from a supervisor is also crucial for improving the quality of their writing.
1. When writing a scientific article, the first step is to decide on a topic, then conduct research and gather as many journal references as possible. From there, we can determine the title and research methodology. Once the full article is written, it undergoes a review process by reviewers. Usually, we need to make several revisions based on their feedback. This process, from revision to final publication, can take quite a long time.
2. A good article must be systematic, use academic language, and have strong data-driven discussions. For us students, the challenge usually lies in maintaining format consistency and finding the most up-to-date references. Technical details, such as word counts and table placement, are also common difficulties.
3. A strong article foundation must be complete, from the Abstract to the Discussion. We rely on tools like official journal templates and APA citation guides to avoid mistakes. The most demanding part is often the Introduction, as it requires a very deep explanation of the research background and objectives.
1. I found that very much in the making of scientific articles. starting with the process before creating the article and working on the article, the quality of the article we create and reference, difficulties during creating the article, the structure within the article, etc.
2. The characteristic of high-quality scientific articles that I got from interviews is how we look for the SINTA (Science and Technology Index) and also take references to recent scientific articles. The challenge often faced by authors of scientific articles is to be confused about titles, keywords, and references.
3. The understanding that I gained in the interview was that I knew the first step before making scientific articles, how we did good scientific articles and according to the journals in our respective majors, the percentage of plagiarism, the structure, the use of AI in scientific articles, and know the difficulty of making articles and how to deal with it.
Name: Laili Humairoh
1.In my opinion, based on what I learned from the interview and other groups results, the process of writing a scientific article starts from choosing a topic, doing research, writing according to the journal format, and then submitting the article. After that, the article will go through review, revision, and the final decision of being accepted or rejected. The common pattern I noticed is that this process is quite long, and revision is a normal part of it.
2.In my opinion, a high-quality scientific article should have a new topic (novelty), valid data, clear writing, and useful discussion. The challenges often faced by authors are finding ideas, managing time, writing in academic language, and dealing with revisions from reviewers. This pattern was also found in many other groups.
3.In my opinion, authors need access to journals, the internet, reference tools such as Mendeley, and guidance from lecturers or mentors. The article structure must also be clear and follow journal rules. The common pattern I noticed from other groups is that authors need support from their environment and proper facilities so the writing process can run smoothly.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.