- This topic has 72 replies, 29 voices, and was last updated 2 weeks, 2 days ago by
.
-
Posts
-
1. Based on my previous experience, to publish an article, you must create a strong title, research references, and integrate them into the introduction. A common pattern that can be identified when compared to other groups is that we all search from clear sources and ensure the answers are correct. We also ensure that the writing adheres to the correct structure and appropriate spelling.
2. Some key characteristics include a clear structure and system, clear and research-based research, and the use of formal, easy-to-understand academic language. However, based on experience, many writers struggle to determine topics and write academically in English. Another similarity with other groups is that they both understand the importance of writing using correct structure.
3. Based on interviews with respondents, it is clear that writing scientific articles requires several key elements, namely resources, support, and structural components. In terms of resources, authors need access to credible references such as journals and books, as well as valid research data. Nearly all groups mentioned the importance of appropriate referencing and writing using a clear structure.
Name: Sania Buchori M
Student ID: 242200691. The writing process, as the author stated at the time, involved writing with confidence and going through a review process. Submissions were made on SINTA website. The general pattern was that the author explained how to create a compelling title by frequently reading on google scholar.
2. The general pattern for high-quality scientific articles is that when checked by turnitin, the paper’s score does not exceed 20%. The challenge is when the author is rejected by reviewers due to high levels of plagiarism.
3. The resources include searching for references on google scholar, supported by reviewers who check whether the scientific article is suitable for publication. Afterward, it is returned to the editor, who will process the publication. The structural components are title, abstract, keywords, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusion, and bibliography.Asri Nurisma Yuniawati
1. From my interview results at that time, writing an article begins with determining a good and appropriate title, an interesting topic to discuss, then determining the method and introduction. This greatly supports the relevance of each trusted reference and we must also adjust to a good article structure. Then compared with other groups, a common pattern often occurs when the article is about to be published because it must go through several reviews and is influenced by certain factors such as the queue in the submission process. In addition, based on questions from each group, the author must be consistent in developing the article.
2. Based on my interview results, a good article must be high quality, with a title and topic that interest readers, and conform to the structure of a scientific article. Furthermore, a good article should have a plagiarism level of around 20%. Scientific articles should also have complete and detailed references, a detailed and coherent methodology. Furthermore, writing articles also faces many challenges, including the risk of plagiarism, as authors often find it difficult to reduce plagiarism, difficulties in developing methodologies, finding appropriate reference, and English language issues in academic.
3. From my interview experience, I’ve learned that journals are the home of written articles. Journals are where scientific articles are published, going through a series of process. In writing these articles, authors need various supporting sources to convince readers. For example, using Google Scholar and Mendeley can help authors find appropriate reference that align with the structure of scientific articles.1. From my interview results at that time, writing an article begins with determining a good and appropriate title, an interesting topic to discuss, then determining the method and introduction. This greatly supports the relevance of each trusted reference and we must also adjust to a good article structure. Then compared with other groups, a common pattern often occurs when the article is about to be published because it must go through several reviews and is influenced by certain factors such as the queue in the submission process. In addition, based on questions from each group, the author must be consistent in developing the article.
2. Based on my interview results, a good article must be high quality, with a title and topic that interest readers, and conform to the structure of a scientific article. Furthermore, a good article should have a plagiarism level of around 20%. Scientific articles should also have complete and detailed references, a detailed and coherent methodology. Furthermore, writing articles also faces many challenges, including the risk of plagiarism, as authors often find it difficult to reduce plagiarism, difficulties in developing methodologies, finding appropriate references, and English language issues in academics.
3. From my interview experience, I’ve learned that journals are the home of written articles. Journals are where scientific articles are published, going through a series of processes. In writing these articles, authors need various supporting sources to convince readers. For example, using Google Scholar and Mendeley can help authors find appropriate references that align with the structure of scientific articles.1. In my opinion, writing a scientific article is a structured but repeated process that takes time and patience. It usually starts from choosing a topic, reviewing literature, doing research, and then continuing with writing and revising the paper. I also see that the submission process is not simple because authors need to follow specific journal guidelines.
2. From my understanding, a high-quality scientific article should be clear, well-organized, and supported by strong data. The ideas need to be presented logically, and the use of academic language is very important. However, I think many authors face difficulties in organizing their ideas and using proper academic English. Responding to reviewers’ feedback can also be challenging, especially when the comments are critical. When I compare this with other groups, I see the same pattern where clarity and strong methodology are always important, while language issues and dealing with feedback are the most common challenges.
3. Based on my experience during the interview, authors need good writing skills, but guidance from supervisors and peers is also very helpful. Access to academic resources is another important factor. I also notice that most respondents use the IMRaD structure to organize their writing. Similar to other groups, I find that mentorship and collaboration play a big role in improving the quality of the article, along with the use of digital tools like reference managers and grammar checkers.
1. From what I learned, writing a scientific article starts with research and drafting based on a journal template, then followed by a long review process. I noticed that other groups found the same thing, that the process takes time and revisions are a normal part of it. It also needs consistency and patience until the article gets published.
2. I found that a high-quality article has a clear structure, uses academic language, and includes recent and reliable references. It should also have something new and low plagiarism. I saw similar challenges with other groups, such as writer’s block, difficulty finding ideas, and problems with journal templates. Many authors also struggle with the strict review process.
3. I learned that writing a scientific article needs resources like Google Scholar and tools such as Mendeley or Google Translate. A clear structure and recent references are also important. From other groups, I saw a similar pattern that success depends on using the right tools, having access to updated journals, and getting support from mentors or lecturers.
1.From the interviews and group discussions, writing a scientific article usually starts with finding a research gap, which requires reading many previous studies. After that, the writer decides the focus, method, and structure of the article. For submission, the process goes through several stages editorial review, peer review, revision, and final decision. This process often takes time and may involve multiple revisions. The common pattern is clear: the process is long, not always linear, and requires patience and consistency. Revisions are a normal part of it.
2. A high-quality article generally has a clear research gap, strong references, detailed methodology, and a well-organized structure. Clarity especially in the abstract and introduction is also very important. The challenges faced by authors vary. Some are technical, like formatting, citation, and plagiarism issues. Others are more personal, such as difficulty finding ideas, writer’s block, language barriers, and low confidence. The pattern shows that challenges are both technical and personal, and rejection or revision is something most writers experience.
3. Writing a scientific article requires proper resources, such as journal access, reference tools, and writing aids. Understanding the article structure is also essential, since each section has a specific role. Support from lecturers, reviewers, and peers is also important in improving the quality of writing. Technology, including AI, can help, but should be used carefully. The common pattern is that successful writing depends on good resources, clear structure, and strong support systems, not just individual ability.
1. I have reviewed the material carefully
2.compare the content with the insight gained from the interview :
a.bsed on my understanding the interview results are generally in line with the journal guidelines that most of the points discussed such as the importance of structure, rreferences, and clarity r also emphasized in the guidelineb.from the interview it seems that in practice, writing scientific articles does not always fully follow the ideal standards shown in the guidelines some part may still be incomplete or less detailed compared to what is required in formal journal writing
c. the difficulty I found is that beginners often make mistakes that can affect the success of publishing their articles and to deal with this it is important to carefully check the writing, including the structure, language use, similarity issues, and whether the content matches the title
3.identify key similarities,differences and patterns
similarities:-both the interview and the guidelines show the use of academic language and a structured format in writing scientific articles.
differences: -some articles may still lack strong supporting references, which makes the ideas less convincing compared to the standard expected in the guidelines.
pattern:-a clear connection between the title,content, method, and references is very important all parts should be consistent and properly linked to produce a good scientific article1. From what I have learned about the process of writing a scientific article, once I have chosen a topic, I, as the author, must gather and obtain numerous valid references related to that topic so that the subsequent steps can be well structured and proceed smoothly. Additionally, the article submission process involves a fairly lengthy sequence, starting with peer review, followed by revisions, and finally publication.
2. A high quality article must have characteristics such as a proper structure, a clear focus on the issue at hand, and the use of research methods appropriate to the topic being addressed, not to mention a low plagiarism rate. One challenge authors may face is ensuring their articles have a low plagiarism rate when checked, nearly all groups encounter this difficulty.
3. The first finding is that journals serve as a platform for articles. The second finding is that, after selecting a topic to begin writing an article, the next step is to search for and obtain articles to use as references for my research. One of the tools that can be used to find these references is Google Scholar. When searching for references, it is recommended to select articles published no more than five years ago. Mendeley can be used as a tool for citing references. In agreement with other groups, we all agree that Google Scholar is the most frequently used platform for finding references.
1. After reviewing and comparing with other groups, we found that the process of writing a scientific article starts with choosing an interesting topic and searching for relevant references through platforms like Google Scholar or Consensus. The topic should have enough supporting references to make it easier to develop.
Then, the writer decides the title, method, and starts writing based on the journal format. After finishing, the article is submitted to a journal and goes through editor screening, peer review, revision, and finally acceptance or rejection. The common pattern is that this process is long, structured, and revision is always a normal part.2. A high-quality scientific article should have a clear research gap, novelty, valid data, a clear method, a systematic structure, sufficient references, and a low plagiarism level (usually under the required limit such as 20%).
The challenges faced by authors include choosing a topic, finding suitable references, writing in academic English, avoiding plagiarism, and dealing with revisions from reviewers. Most difficulties happen at the beginning stage and during revision.3. From our interview and discussion, writers need access to references such as Google Scholar and tools like Mendeley, Grammarly, and Google Translate. Guidance from lecturers or supervisors is also very important. The main components of a scientific article include research gap, references, method, structure, and correct citations. Usually, around 20 or more references are needed, preferably from the last five years, depending on journal rules.
In general, successful writing depends on good references, useful tools, and academic support, while editors and reviewers play an important role in improving article quality through feedback and revision.1. The process begins with defining the title, method, and research subjects before drafting the introduction. For submission, it is crucial to align the work with the journal’s scope, verify its Sinta rank, and ensure plagiarism is below 20% via Turnitin, though following a template does not guarantee acceptance. A common pattern is the universal structure shared by all articles, which ensures academic consistency regardless of the specific topic.
2. High-quality articles are defined by deep thematic understanding, a clear research gap, and robust references from Google Scholar, including relevant older citations. Writers often face challenges like a lack of depth and a lack of confidence during the iterative writing process. A common pattern highlights that success requires both technical accuracy and the mental persistence to meet the rigorous standards of reviewers.
3. Key resources include Google Scholar for citations and a clear distinction between the journal as the host and the article as the content. Reviewers determine an article’s viability, supported by structural components like accurate bibliographies and Sinta accreditation. A common pattern shows that while digital tools are indispensable, the ultimate value lies in substantive depth and research mastery rather than administrative formatting.
1. When writing an article, the first thing we need to do is decide on a title based on the references we have found. After that, we determine the method we will use, followed by writing the introduction. The abstract is written last.
2. The keywords in the abstract should be adjusted to match the variables in the title.
3. It is recommended to use as many journal article references as possible—the more, the better—and preferably from the last five years.1.When starting an article, start with a title that generates numerous references. Then, you need to delve deeper into the introduction and draw from published references.
2.High-quality articles will be ranked in terms of syntax, with a plagiarism rate of only 20%. Frequent The challenge often faced by authors of scientific articles is to be confused about titles, keywords, and references.
3.The journal is the home of the article. When writing an article, many tools are permitted, such as Grammarly and Google Translate.
80% of the last five years are allowed.
A minimum of 20 references is required, and more is preferable.
The title should have 12 words,
a maximum of 15 pages, and
references in Indonesian-language articles are fine, but it’s better to look for them in foreign or English-language articles.Name: Dina sri rahayu
1. The process of writing a scientific article begins with topic selection, literature review, data collection and analysis, draft writing, revision, and journal submission and review.
The same pattern as other groups is that the process is gradual and requires revision2. A quality article has a clear purpose, coherent structure, relevant references, and good academic language.
Common challenges include topic selection, time constraints, English language barriers, and reviewer revisions.
The general pattern: structure is important, and revisions and language are the main obstacles.3. Writing an article requires access to references, guidance from lecturers, writing aids, and an understanding of structure (IMRAD).
The same pattern applies: support and an understanding of structure are crucial.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.