QuiryThink

Assignment 1.5

Home Forums Assignment 1.5

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2930

    Purpose

    The purpose of this activity is to help students gain deeper understanding of the publication process by exploring the expectations, challenges, resources, and evaluation criteria that are commonly applied in reviewing scientific articles.

    Instructions

    1. Prepare a set of interview questions based on the following categories:
      • Process: Steps in writing and submitting a scientific article.
      • Quality: Characteristics of a high-quality scientific article.
      • Challenges: Common obstacles faced by authors during writing and submission.
      • Resources: Support, tools, or resources needed for writing.
      • Structure & Content: Main components that must be included in a research article.
    2. Arrange a schedule and conduct the interview in a professional manner.
    3. Take detailed notes during the interview, highlighting important advice, suggestions, and observations.
    4. Summarize the findings by identifying patterns, recurring feedback, and practical recommendations.

    Assignment Report

    Each group submits a written report that includes:

    1. Key insights from editors or reviewers.
    2. Frequent challenges faced by authors.
    3. Recommended resources and support for improving scientific writing.
    4. Suggestions for improving manuscript clarity, structure, and content.
    #3854
    Hasni
    Participant

    Aidha P. Azzahra S. (24220118)
    Hasni Melisa Putri (24220098)
    Mutia Rahmawati (24220085)
    Nadifa Rheihan Nisa (24220133)
    Academic Writing
    Process:
    1. Bagaimana cara membuat latar belakang yang baik berdasarkan variabel di judul?
    2. Kalau nulis jurnal dalam bahasa Indonesia terus di translate ke Inggris itu bisa atau ngga? Apa harus dari awal kalimat yang di susun itu dari Bahasa apInggris?
    3. Apakah abstrak disusun terakhir?
    Quality:
    1. Bagaimana cara kita membuktikan kalau sitasi yang diambil itu valid?
    2. Apakah ada perbedaan kualitas jurnal yang dibaca berdasarkan bahasa? Misalnya, mau bikin jurnal dalam Bahasa Inggris, tapi kita baca referensi Bahasa Indonesia?
    3. Apa faktor yang bikin validity atau quality sebuah jurnal dipertanyakan?
    Challenges:
    1. Faktor apa yang bikin mahasiswa kesulitan menyusun jurnal?
    Resources:
    1. Kalo mau ngutip kalimat di salah satu jurnal tapi itu juga kutipan orang dari jurnal lain, gimana menyusun daftar pustakanya gimana?
    2. Kalau mau ngutip dari jurnal atau buku ada maksimal berapa tahun nya ga? Misalnya harus 5 tahun kebelakang.
    3. Dalam satu bagian, minimal ada berapa sitasi yang harus dipakai?
    Structure Content:
    1. Ada berapa kah versi jurnal? Ada yang referencenya di setiap bagian bawah halaman (kutipan di paragrafnya pake angka pangkat kecil) ada juga yang di daftar pustaka kutipan di paragraf biasa (Nina, 2026)
    2. Apa bedanya pembahasan di latar belakang dan di hasil dan pembahasan?
    3. Apa bedanya APA dan MLA style?

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.