Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Name : Hana Fauziah
LINK : https://1drv.ms/w/c/96E4AD4D4C3DBA1F/IQAxdqrZueIsR6ZlPYEWrqutAYCgMyvz5O_nMaZh6ga9Rf8?e=ikX4taMove 1 describing Data Collection Procedures
# step 1 Stating the research design :
The study applies a survey research design to investigate students’ needs regarding critical writing courses in higher education. This method is appropriate because it allows researchers to collect information from a large number of participants# step 2 Describing participants :
The participants of the study are 437 undergraduate students majoring in English from four different universities in Surakarta, Indonesia. The article clearly identifies the sample to show the relevance of the collected data.# step 3 Describing research instruments :
The researchers use a questionnaire as the main instrument for data collection. The questionnaire is designed to gather students’ perceptions, difficulties, and expectations related to critical writing learning.# step 4 Explaining data collection procedures:
The article explains that the questionnaire was distributed to the participants, and the responses were collected systematically for further analysis.Move 2 Describing Data Analysis Procedures
– Step 1 (Specifying analytical methods):
The collected data were analyzed using statistical analysis to identify patterns and major findings related to students’ needs in critical writing.– Step 2 (Explaining interpretation of data):
The researchers categorized and interpreted the results to determine the main challenges faced by students and the important aspects needed in developing a critical writing course.Move 3 (Providing Methodological Justification)
– Step 1 (Justifying the chosen method):
The use of survey research is suitable because it helps the researchers obtain broad and detailed information about students’ perspectives, which supports the development of a more effective critical writing curriculumMove 1: Establishing the Research Territory
Paragraph 1:
Step: Claiming centrality
The author highlights the importance of critical thinking as a fundamental skill in education and decision-making processes.
Paragraph 2
Step: Topic generalization
The discussion broadens to explain critical writing and its connection to critical thinking, emphasizing its role in academic contexts.
Paragraph 3
Step: Claiming centrality
The author stresses the significance of critical writing instruction, particularly in English language learning.
Paragraph 4
Step : Generalization with justification
The paragraph underlines the importance of conducting needs analysis to improve the teaching and learning of critical writing.
Paragraph 5
Step: Reviewing previous research
The author summarizes several earlier studies that address students’ challenges and needs in developing critical writing skills.
Move 2: Establishing a Niche
Paragraph
Step 1A: Indicating a gap
The author points out that research on learners’ needs in critical writing, especially in EFL contexts, is still insufficient.
Step 2: Presenting justification
It is further argued that investigating these needs is necessary to enhance instructional practices and learning outcomes.
Move 3: Presenting the Present Research
Paragraph 7
Step 1: outlining the purpose of the study
The study aims to identify students’ learning needs in critical writing at the tertiary level.
Step2: Summarizing the method
A survey design is employed to collect data from English learners.
Step 6: Stating the value of the study
in the final explain that The findings are expected to contribute to improving curriculum design and teaching strategies in critical writing courses.Pesan Suara Vocaroo https://voca.ro/182QYGZrHeek
1. I have reviewed the material carefully
2.compare the content with the insight gained from the interview :
a.bsed on my understanding the interview results are generally in line with the journal guidelines that most of the points discussed such as the importance of structure, rreferences, and clarity r also emphasized in the guidelineb.from the interview it seems that in practice, writing scientific articles does not always fully follow the ideal standards shown in the guidelines some part may still be incomplete or less detailed compared to what is required in formal journal writing
c. the difficulty I found is that beginners often make mistakes that can affect the success of publishing their articles and to deal with this it is important to carefully check the writing, including the structure, language use, similarity issues, and whether the content matches the title
3.identify key similarities,differences and patterns
similarities:-both the interview and the guidelines show the use of academic language and a structured format in writing scientific articles.
differences: -some articles may still lack strong supporting references, which makes the ideas less convincing compared to the standard expected in the guidelines.
pattern:-a clear connection between the title,content, method, and references is very important all parts should be consistent and properly linked to produce a good scientific articlee1. I have reviewed the material carefully
2.compare the content with the insight gained from the interview :
a.bsed on my understanding the interview results are generally in line with the journal guidelines that most of the points discussed such as the importance of structure, rreferences, and clarity r also emphasized in the guidelineb.from the interview it seems that in practice, writing scientific articles does not always fully follow the ideal standards shown in the guidelines some part may still be incomplete or less detailed compared to what is required in formal journal writing
c. the difficulty I found is that beginners often make mistakes that can affect the success of publishing their articles and to deal with this it is important to carefully check the writing, including the structure, language use, similarity issues, and whether the content matches the title
3.identify key similarities,differences and patterns
similarities:-both the interview and the guidelines show the use of academic language and a structured format in writing scientific articles.
differences: -some articles may still lack strong supporting references, which makes the ideas less convincing compared to the standard expected in the guidelines.
pattern:-a clear connection between the title,content, method, and references is very important all parts should be consistent and properly linked to produce a good scientific article1. my findings on the writing and submission of scientific articles that the process of writing and submitting a scientific article usually begins by deciding on a title and then finding references that match the topic we want to study(the references should be relevant) reading journal articles is also important to understand proper academic writing and from there the title, method, and main focus of the article can be decided
2.a good scientific article usually has a clear research gap, enough references, and a clear explanation of the method.the structure also needs to be neat and easy to follow. Besides that the quality of the article really depends on how strong the content is.some challenges that authors often face are the risk of plagiarism, difficulty in finding a research gap, mismatch between the title and the method, lack of explanation in the methodology, problems with academic English
3.from my experience during the interview,i learn that articles and journals are not actually different rather the a journal functions as a platform or a (home) where scientific articles are published. in writing a scientific article authors need various supporting resources for example like Google Scholar are important for finding reliable references, and reading previous journal articles helps as a guideline and benchmark. In addition tools such as google translate can assist authors in dealing with language difficulties. i also learned that it is generally recommended to use references published within the last five years to ensure the information is up to date and relevant
1.I read an article titled “Analysis of English Learning Difficulty of Student in Elementary School” I read it from Google Scholar. This article discusses the difficulties of elementary school students in learning English, I feel interested in reading it because the topic is exciting to discuss
2.In my opinion, the thing that makes it impressive is the topic because it is very relevant to the conditions in the classroom, but there is also a challenging part is the discussion which is quite formal and detailed explanations, especially in the research methods section
3.The part that is quite difficult for me is the methodology, because in this part there are many terms that are quite difficult to understand
4.Reading journals helps me in understanding the structure of writing, the use of formal language, and also how to structure ideas logically1. I read an article titled “Analysis of English Learning Difficulty of Student in Elementary School” I read it from Google Scholar. This article discusses the difficulties of elementary school students in learning English, I feel interested in reading it because the topic is exciting to discuss
2. In my opinion, the thing that makes it impressive is the topic because it is very relevant to the conditions in the classroom, but there is also a challenging part is the discussion which is quite formal and detailed explanations, especially in the research methods section
3. The part that is quite difficult for me is the methodology, because in this part there are many terms that are quite difficult to understand
4. Reading journals helps me in understanding the structure of writing, the use of formal language, and also how to structure ideas logically