Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Paragraphs 1-5, move 1, introduce the research topic and discuss the importance of critical thinking and critical writing.
Paragraph 6, move 2, identifies the research gap, highlighting the shortcomings of previous research and the need for further research.
Paragraph 7, move 3, discusses the author’s research objectives.
1. I have studied it.
2. a. There is alignment in the Abstract section, where the abstract must include the research objectives, research methods, results, and research novelty. The abstract reflects the entire content of the article. Then, the number of words in the article is no more than 7000 words.
b. The standards reflected in both articles are following a structured journal format and the appropriate journal template to avoid rejection.
c. One of the challenges in writing scientific articles is plagiarism. The strategy to overcome this is to paraphrase and use relevant references appropriately.
3. Key Similarities
• The abstract should contain the research objectives, methods, results, and novelty.
• The keywords should be related to the title.Differences
• In the research methods section, the journal template explains how to write the method, while the interview results section explains how to choose a method that is appropriate for the article.Patterns
• The article must be clear and focused. The research objectives must align with the results, and the article must not deviate from its focus.1. When writing a scientific article, first determine the topic, then conduct research and seek as many references as possible from journals.
From there, the author can determine the title and methodology for the article. After completing the article from beginning to end, it will go through a reviewer assessment process. Authors typically make multiple revisions to accommodate reviewer feedback. The revision process until publication can take quite a long time.2. A quality scientific article is typically structured according to the requirements, includes accurate data analysis, appropriate research methods, and references to articles within the last five years.
Common challenges faced by authors include inconsistencies in the method and title, limited vocabulary, and a lack of confidence.3. Authors must understand several tools available for writing scientific articles, such as Google Scholar. They must frequently consult journals and books for reference. Support from a supervisor is also crucial for improving the quality of their writing.
1. When writing a scientific article, first determine the topic, then conduct research and seek as many references as possible from journals.
From there, the author can determine the title and methodology for the article. After completing the article from beginning to end, it will go through a reviewer assessment process. Authors typically make multiple revisions to accommodate reviewer feedback. The revision process until publication can take quite a long time.2. A quality scientific article is typically structured according to the requirements, includes accurate data analysis, appropriate research methods, and references to articles within the last five years.
Common challenges faced by authors include inconsistencies in the method and title, limited vocabulary, and a lack of confidence.3. Authors must understand several tools available for writing scientific articles, such as Google Scholar. They must frequently consult journals and books for reference. Support from a supervisor is also crucial for improving the quality of their writing.
GROUP MEMBERS:
1. GHAIDA SALSABILA A
2. ALYA LUTFIYATUNNISA
3. NUR SITI FADILAH
4. HANA FAUZIAH1. Bagaimana urutan penulisan artikel ilmiah?
2. Boleh tidak dalam pembuatan artikel bahasa Inggris mengambil referensi dari artikel bahasa Indonesia?
3. Apakah ada batasan referensi?
4. Berapa minimal jumlah kata?
5. Apa faktor utama artikel lolos publish atau tidak?
6. Bagaimana cara memilih keyword yang tepat pada penulisan artikel?1. The topic of the journal article I read was “Students’ Perception of Watching English Movies to Improve Speaking Skills.” I read the journal article a week ago. I accessed it on Google Schooler. When I read the article, I was intrigued because I found many people with similar language learning styles as I did.
2. My experience reading this article was memorable because the topic was interesting and the explanations were quite clear. However, I also had some difficulty reading it due to the use of academic language.
3. The most difficult part of the journal article to understand was the Findings section. It contained a lot of data in the form of tables and percentages, requiring careful attention to understand its meaning.
4. From reading the journal article, I learned the stages in writing an article, starting with the introduction, methods, results, and conclusions.