TOPIC 1. WHY IS ACADEMIC WRITING IMPORTANT FOR STUDENTS IN HIGHER EDUCATION?

INTRODUCTION

A. Learning Objectives:

After completing this session, students are expected to be able to:

Explain the importance of academic writing in higher education.
Identify challenges commonly encountered when reading academic journal articles.
Select relevant journal articles based on topic alignment.
Develop exploratory interview questions related to scientific article writing practices.

B. Skill Focus of This Unit

This unit develops students’ academic writing competencies progressively, beginning with foundational understanding and moving toward higher-level academic inquiry skills.

C. Micro Skills Developed

In this unit, students are trained to:

recognize the purpose and characteristics of academic writing in higher education,
identify structural and linguistic challenges in academic journal articles,
analyze rhetorical features and key components of research texts,
apply criteria to evaluate the relevance and credibility of scholarly sources.

These micro skills strengthen students’ reading awareness, analytical ability, and critical engagement with academic texts.

D. Macro Skills Developed

Through these foundational abilities, students gradually develop the ability to:

critically interpret academic discourse within disciplinary contexts,
engage with scholarly literature in a purposeful and selective manner,
design exploratory interview questions that reflect an understanding of scientific writing practices.

These macro skills prepare students for deeper inquiry, research-based discussion, and the development of their own academic writing projects.

BRAINSTORMING

A. Academic Writing

Academic writing is an essential requirement for any college student, particularly in Indonesia, where writing and publishing scientific articles have become prerequisites for obtaining academic degrees. The mandate for academic publications was specified in Circular Letter No. 152/E/T/2012 from the Director General of Higher Education, highlighting the need for bachelor, master, and doctoral students to publish their research as part of their graduation requirements. This emphasis on publication is reinforced by policies such as Permenristekdikti No. 20 Tahun 2017, where the Indonesian government encourages universities to increase both the quantity and quality of scientific publications. These policies aim to elevate both the quantity and quality of research publications, contributing to global knowledge and enhancing Indonesia’s academic reputation. Additionally, academics in Indonesian higher education must conduct research and publish their findings in national and international journals, as these outputs are often used to measure institutional quality and academic reputation. This indicates that academic writing is inevitable for tertiary education students as they have to make research papers which require them to integrate other people’s works as references into their own papers. Therefore, some basic rules are used as a guideline to produce a good product of academic writing. At the tertiary education level, students’ success in academic writing is determined by their ability to comprehend and use others’ ideas to voice their own opinion.

However, even though academic writing is important it poses challenges. Several studies have explored the challenges and pedagogical approaches related to academic writing in Indonesian higher education. Bram and Angelina (2022) investigated the difficulties faced by tertiary education students in academic writing and proposed solutions to overcome them. Their study, which surveyed 26 students from Sanata Dharma University, revealed common setbacks such as issues with parts of speech, tenses, vocabulary, cohesion, and referencing. They suggested that lecturers should be equipped with various writing strategies, and students should enhance their organizational skills, critical thinking, and referencing abilities. Similarly, Aunurrahman et. al. (2017) investigated the academic writing competencies of first-year tertiary EFL students, particularly focusing on critical thinking. The study analyzed students’ argumentative writing using functional grammar based on systemic functional linguistics. Findings revealed that students across different proficiency levels struggled with schematic structure and linguistic features of academic writing, with limited critical thinking capacity. The research suggested that explicit teaching and cooperative learning activities should be incorporated to enhance students’ academic writing and critical thinking skills.

These challenges are often caused by traditional teaching approaches that fail to engage students or adequately support their skill development (Nugrahini & Rakhmawati, 2022). One such approach that has received considerable criticism is the product approach. This approach has several limitations. First, it can hinder creativity because it relies heavily on imitating model texts. Critics argue that this method prevents students from thinking critically and writing creatively, as they mainly replicate and reproduce existing texts (Li, 2007). This indicates that the instructional models commonly used in higher education have not always effectively addressed the challenges students face. Therefore, there is a need for innovative teaching approaches that not only engage students but also enhance their writing skills.

B. QuiryThink Learning Model: An Innovative Solution for Academic Writing Challenges

In most Indonesian universities, academic writing has traditionally been taught using a lecture based approach, product approach and process approach. These models frequently fail to engage students in critical thinking and creativity, which are essential for effective academic writing. In the realm of academic writing instruction, existing models have been critiqued for various limitations. While traditional approaches to writing instruction vary, lecture-based models remain dominant in Indonesian higher education. These courses primarily focus on theoretical explanations of grammar, sentence structure, and paragraph organization, with minimal opportunities for students to apply their knowledge through iterative feedback (Hyland, 2003). As a result, students often become passive recipients rather than active participants in their learning. This suggests that many existing models lack contextual relevance and fail to engage students in meaningful learning experiences. Thus, the need for innovative and effective teaching models are required to enhance students’ learning experiences. This necessity highlights the urgency of developing instructional models that help students improve their writing proficiency and their critical thinking. Addressing this gap, Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) emerges as a promising framework, as it actively engages students in exploration, investigation, and critical reflection. Unlike conventional teaching approaches, IBL places students at the center of learning by encouraging them to develop questions, gather information, and construct knowledge through analysis and synthesis.

IBL is one of the most effective models for implementation in teaching, particularly in fostering student engagement, problem-solving abilities, and higher-order thinking skills. (Avsec & Kocijancic, 2014; Gholam, 2019). According to Ghufron and Ermawati (2018), IBL trains students’ thinking skills in solving problems and directs them to become independent learners through a series of activities. The activities include five stages proposed by Marshal (2013) such as engagement, exploration, explanation, elaboration, and assessment. This process aligns closely with the cognitive demands of academic writing, which involves higher-order thinking, iterative feedback, and reflective learning. Research has shown that IBL not only improves students’ writing outcomes but also fosters critical thinking and independent learning (Adhami & Taghizadeh, 2024; Wale & Bogale, 2021; Wale & Bishaw, 2020).

However, despite its strengths in promoting inquiry and deeper understanding, IBL alone may not address the need for creativity and innovation in academic writing, which is essential for producing original and strong arguments (Zheng, 2019). The effectiveness of this approach to developing writing abilities is limited by its reliance on strong instructional support and the fact that not all students are ready for independent study (Sam, 2024; Milatasari, 2012). As stated by Krajcik et al. (1998) that the necessity of accessible tools that accommodate students’ varying abilities and experiences. Without proper guidance and support, students may find it challenging to navigate the inquiry process, ultimately hindering their ability to critically analyze and construct well-structured academic writing. Thus, IBL may not be appropriate for unmotivated students and can be challenging to implement in short period of time (Milatasari, 2012). These limitations indicate that while IBL is effective in promoting critical thinking and active learning, but it does not entirely accommodate the sequential and cyclical nature of academic writing. Several studies have highlighted the limitations of Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) in providing a structured and iterative process that helps students systematically refine and develop their ideas. As classified by Kirschner et al. (2006), IBL is considered a form of minimally guided instruction. It is in line with the findings of Lazonder and Harmsen (2016) criticized inquiry-based learning for lacking clarity on the teacher’s role in guiding students throughout the learning process. Similarly, Krajcik and Blumenfeld (2006) reveal that IBL presents challenges in terms of structure, as students must independently discover solutions without clear guidance on how to develop and iterate their ideas. This lack of explicit scaffolding can hinder students’ ability to refine their arguments and improve their academic writing skills effectively. Furthermore, Sam (2024) asserts that IBL has a positive impact on students’ critical thinking, motivation, and academic performance, though its success largely depends on supportive learning environments and effective technological integration. These challenges indicate the need for a complementary approach that provides a structured yet flexible framework to enhance students’ creative and problem-solving abilities in academic writing. To address these limitations, a more iterative model like Design Thinking is needed. This approach emphasizes a cyclical process of ideation, prototyping, feedback, and revision.

Design thinking approach ensures that students not only engage in exploration but also systematically enhance the quality of their academic output (Plattner et al., 2009). This approach consists of five stages such as empathize, define, ideate, prototype, and test (Goldman et al., 2010; Plattner et al., 2009). These stages provide a systematic framework that not only helps students develop solutions to complex academic writing challenges but also fosters creativity through iterative exploration. Design Thinking fosters a problem-solving mindset by emphasizing empathy, ideation, and prototyping, which are essential for addressing challenges in writing tasks (Fan & Ye, 2022). The iterative nature of this framework enables students to break down complex writing problems into manageable steps, guiding them through brainstorming, drafting, and revising.

Additionally, Goldman et al. (2009) highlight that Design Thinking strengthens students’ problem-solving skills through project-based learning, encouraging them to take action, experiment with ideas, and refine their arguments systematically. This structured process ensures that students not only generate ideas but also assess and improve them, thereby bridging the gap between conceptual exploration and effective written communication. Furthermore, the Empathize and Define stages help students identify their audience and clarify research questions, two of the most challenging aspects of academic writing. Beyond problem-solving, Design Thinking also nurtures creativity by promoting experimentation and iterative refinement of ideas. Rauth et al. (2010) describe Design Thinking as a meta-disciplinary approach that enhances creative confidence and competence through project- and process-based learning. This approach encourages students to engage in active learning and collaboration, which are key to developing innovative writing strategies. Design Thinking complements Inquiry-Based Learning (IBL) by providing a structured, iterative framework that guides students in refining ideas and developing high-quality academic writing. Integrating digital tools further enhances engagement, collaboration, and metacognitive skills (Koh et al., 2015; Utami et al., 2023). The QuiryThink Learning Model builds on this integration, combining IBL, Design Thinking, and Digital Multimodal Composing (DMC) to foster creativity, reflective thinking, and learner autonomy, offering an innovative approach that addresses the demands of academic writing in EFL higher education contexts.

C. Scientific Article Writing and the QuiryThink Learning Model

One important form of academic writing is the scientific article. Writing a scientific article is not only about following rules of structure and language, but also about presenting research so that it can be shared with a wider academic community. For students in higher education, learning how to write scientific articles is very important. It allows them to publish their work, contribute to the improvement of language teaching, and connect with other researchers around the world. In this way, scientific article writing becomes more than just a classroom task; it is also a step toward professional development and participation in global academic discussions. To support students in mastering this complex process, the QuiryThink Learning Model provides a structured, step-by-step framework. It guides students through nine systematic stage to develop publishable academic writing:

Question (Q): Students develop awareness of academic writing challenges by reflecting on difficulties encountered in reading journal articles, exploring publication ethics, examining journal databases, comparing published articles, and collaboratively generating meaningful inquiry questions about academic writing quality and publish ability.
Interview (I): Students investigate authentic academic publishing practices by conducting interviews and examining insights from experienced academic authors, editors, or reviewers. Through this process, they explore characteristics of publishable articles, analyze journal author guidelines, and present findings using multimodal formats such as slides, visual summaries, and digital mind maps.
Recognize (R): Students recognize rhetorical structures, academic conventions, and research positioning by analyzing model research articles, conducting rhetorical move analysis, and mapping research trends using digital tools such as Connected Papers.
Yield (Y): Students produce initial academic writing drafts by focusing on the alignment of rhetorical moves in each section, developing coherent arguments, and adhering to academic and digital ethics.
Transform (T): Students evaluate the rhetorical effectiveness, academic ethics, and digital ethics of their drafts through structured peer review and rubric-based evaluation.
Hone (H): Students refine their drafts by revising draft sections based on structured peer review feedback.
Improve (I): Students enhance manuscript quality, accuracy, and academic integrity by evaluating their work using journal reviewer rubrics, digital writing tools (e.g., plagiarism detection and grammar checkers), and lecturer formative feedback.
Nurture (N): Students finalize their manuscripts through reflective evaluation and pre-submission checks
Keep (K): Students prepare manuscripts for final submission by engaging with submission tutorials, submitting their articles to target journals, and reflecting on their overall academic writing and submission experiences.

This Q-I-R-Y-T-H-I-N-K sequence provides a step-by-step, integrated framework combining Inquiry-Based Learning, Design Thinking, and Digital Multimodal Composing (DMC) to foster creativity, reflection, and autonomy in academic writing. Throughout these stages, students will be guided step by step: from asking questions, gathering information, analyzing, drafting, revising, and finally preparing your article for submission and publication. In this first session, we will focus on the Question stage: reflecting on your journal reading experiences, identifying the most challenging aspects, and raising critical questions about how scientific articles are structured and written. In this section, students begin by reflecting on their own experiences in reading and writing academic texts. This reflection is important because their past experiences can serve as a foundation for understanding the challenges, needs, and expectations in learning how to write scientific articles. Just like learning to listen before speaking, engaging with journal articles through reading is an essential first step before producing effective academic writing.

D. Worksheet 1.1 – Personal Reflection

This topic has 72 replies, 31 voices, and was last updated 2 weeks, 2 days ago by Fadhil Akbar.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)

1 2 3 →

Author

Posts
September 2, 2025 at 11:30 am #2520
gunadi.rustian@upi.edu
Keymaster
Please write about ONE of your most memorable experiences in reading a journal article. Then, answer the questions below:
1. Briefly describe your experience in reading the article (What was the topic? When did you read it? How did you access it? What did you feel while reading it?).
2. In your opinion, what made the experience memorable or challenging (e.g., the topic, the structure, the language, or the argumentation)?
3. Which part of a journal article do you usually find the most difficult to understand (e.g., abstract, introduction, methodology, discussion, references)? Why?
4. In your opinion, how does reading journal articles help you improve your own academic writing skills?
5. (To be discussed in class) From your story and your classmates’ experiences, what can you conclude about the common challenges students face when reading journal articles?
(To be discussed in class or onlione ) From your story and your classmates’ experiences, what can you conclude about the common challenges students face when reading journal articles?
April 7, 2026 at 6:51 am #3796

Avada
Participant

1. the topic is about Perceptions of Collaborative Video Projects in the Language Classroom. I read it last week in th

April 7, 2026 at 6:56 am #3797

Nadifa
Participant

1. The topic of the journal that I read is about the struggles of teachers in teaching English vocabularies for young learner. I read it about two to three weeks ago, through Google Scholar. It was a brief journal as well so I feel motivated to make my own one.
2. Forming the language is personally challenging for me since formal and academic is something I am not familiar with.
3. It is mostly the reference part, in my experience. Reference part is the most complicated because besides I have to choose the references, I must credit them properly, while in another hand, I also have to be able to prove its authenticity and validity as well.
4. With how I can learn from knowing the academic phrases’ existence first then start to learn to paraphrase it so that I can make one my own.

April 7, 2026 at 7:17 am #3802

Alyaa
Participant

1. I read the article “The Use of Web-Based Vocabulary Games to Improve Junior High School Students’ Vocabulary Mastery in Reading.” I read this article three weeks ago for an academic writing course through an online journal. I was interested, although some sections were quite difficult due to the use of jargon.
2. Because this article deals with modern learning and uses games, the language is quite difficult to understand.
3. I found the methodology section quite difficult because it uses a lot of research terminology.
4. Because it can improve academic writing skills, especially in organizing ideas and using formal language.

Alyaa mahfudzah

April 7, 2026 at 7:40 am #3804

Nur
Participant

1.The topic of the article I read about the use songs to improve english studen . I read last week.access google scholar.I read by repeat it 3x because I understood it repeat.
2.The explanation is very clear and can be understood by many people.
3.Introduction
because there is too much to understand.
4.Yes,
Reading articles can increase vocabulary
and can write sentences well.

April 7, 2026 at 7:41 am #3805

Ghaida
Participant

1. The topic I’m reading is “The use of song in English teaching for junior high school students.” I read it last week. I accessed the journal through Google Scholar. When I read this journal I was inspired Because I came to know that the teaching method using songs is effective.
2. In my opinion after reading this article The topic is very relevant because it suits the class conditions which are quite boring during learning and the learning method using songs really helps to enliven the class atmosphere.
3. I think the methodology part is quite difficult,Because it involves research terms that must be read very carefully.
4. Reading this article helped me improve my knowledge about how to write a good article, and Read more expert theories related to the topic

April 7, 2026 at 7:41 am #3806

Aulia
Participant

1. A few weeks ago, I read a journal titled “Classroom Interaction in Communicative Language Teaching in Secondary Schools,” which discusses how teachers and students interact during English lessons. This experience was incredibly beneficial as it highlighted the gap between theory and the reality of the classroom.
2. The part I found most interesting was that students often hesitate to speak due to a lack of confidence and the fear of making mistakes. The main challenge lies in the complex factors that hinder effective communication within the classroom environment.
3. The “Discussion” section is usually the most difficult because it requires a profound understanding of how field data relates to various expert theories.
4. Reading this article helped me understand proper journal structure, academic terminology, and how to cite sources correctly to avoid plagiarism.

April 7, 2026 at 7:49 am #3807

Nenden
Participant

1. The journal topic I read was Exploring the Use of Subtitled Videos in Teaching Listening Skills to Junior High School Students. This journal explains the use of videos with subtitles to help improve the listening skills of junior high school students. I read it while working on a college assignment, accessing it via Google Scholar. While reading it, I felt motivated.
2. What impressed me was the many new vocabularies, but that also became a challenge for me. Also, the language is quite formal and lengthy.
3. In my opinion, the most difficult part was the methodology, because there were many research terms that I didn’t quite understand.
4. It helped because from there we know how to write well and correctly.

April 7, 2026 at 7:54 am #3808

Rafli
Participant

1. The article I read was about audiovisual media in reading. I came across it when I was planning to write an article on a similar topic, and I found it through Google Scholar. As I read it, I felt as though I were experiencing real-life situations firsthand. The topic was particularly challenging because it was highly relevant and reflected actual conditions in the field, and it covered many complex yet understandable aspects.
2. The most memorable and challenging is the structure and the language Because the structure and language of this article lean more toward an academic style, and in terms of structure, there are still many aspects I don’t fully understand
3. The most difficult to understand is find some reference for the article Because when looking for references, sometimes the references we find align with the topic we want to discuss, and other times they contradict it
4. Reading articles can indeed improve my academic writing skills because I can learn formal language, proper writing structure, and how to construct logical arguments

April 11, 2026 at 12:12 pm #3809

Siti
Participant

1. The topic I read is The use of game-based learning in English class I read this article last Sunday, I accessed this article from Google Scholar, there are some words that I don’t know from the article and it makes me a little difficult.
2. There are some difficulties because there is a lot of vocabulary that I haven’t mastered, from the language there is a lot that I don’t understand.
3. I have difficulty when I understand the references because I have to check each reference one by one for accuracy.
4. Because of reading the journal my vocabulary has increased and I know how to write a good journal such as its grammar.

April 12, 2026 at 6:28 am #3810

Sintya
Participant

1. I recently read a digital article about how classroom environments affect high school students’ English speaking skills and felt intrigued by the specific challenges students face in practice.
2. The argumentation was memorable because it highlighted the surprising gap between strong teacher support and the high level of anxiety students still feel when speaking.
3. I find the methodology section most difficult to understand because it requires a deep grasp of statistical formulas and technical data processing.
4. Reading these articles helps me improve my writing by providing a clear template for academic structure and teaching me how to use formal citations correctly.

April 12, 2026 at 1:09 pm #3811

Asri
Participant

1. A few weeks ago, I read the article titled “Investigating Students Speaking Difficulties.” I access the journal on Google Scholar. The journal discusses how students experience speaking difficulties, so I was interested in the specific challenges these students face.
2. While reading the article, I was impressed by the arguments contain in it. I also felt challenge to try to understand the content more deeply.
3. I found the methodology and referencing quite challenging, as they require a high level of understanding, involving research term and a detailed understanding of data processing. Furthermore, creating reference was quite challenging because in addition to having to select references, I also had to improve the originality of my writing and properly align credits.
4. Reading this article help me improve my writing skills and deepen my understanding of the theories that influence my writing.

April 13, 2026 at 9:38 am #3812

Anasya
Participant

1. I read an article about students’ difficulties in learning English vocabulary at the eighth grade level. I read it recently for my assignment, and I accessed it from an online journal. The article focuses on the problems students face when learning vocabulary, such as understanding meanings and remembering new words. While reading it, I felt interested because the topic is very close to real classroom situations. It also made me reflect on how important vocabulary is in learning English.

2. What made this experience memorable is the topic itself, because it reflects real problems faced by students in Indonesia. I found it interesting that many students struggle with vocabulary due to limited exposure to English. It also made me realize that vocabulary is not just about memorizing words, but also understanding how to use them. The challenging part was understanding the different factors that influence students’ difficulties. I had to think carefully to connect the problems with the causes explained in the article.

3. I usually find the methodology section the most difficult. This is because it explains how the research was conducted in a very detailed way. Sometimes I feel confused about why certain methods are used and how they help answer the research questions. It also includes specific steps that are not always easy to follow. Because of that, I need more time to understand this part.

4. In my opinion, reading journal articles helps me understand how to develop ideas in a clear and logical way. I can learn how to explain a topic step by step, from background to conclusion. It also helps me see how researchers connect problems, causes, and solutions in their writing. Besides that, I become more aware of how to make my writing more structured and organized. Overall, it helps me write more clearly and thoughtfully.

April 13, 2026 at 12:33 pm #3813

Deraya
Participant

1. A couple weeks ago, I read an article about the implementation of Problem Based Learning (PBL) that I found on Google Scholar. To be honest, I felt kind of overwhelmed at first because it was my first time reading a full academic paper in English. It was quite challenging to follow, but as I kept reading, I realized that the article offered many new insights that were very important for me to learn.
2. For me, the topic was challenging because I want to figure it out if PBL is still relevant with Kurikulum Merdeka. I’m curious if this learning model actually works or not in our current schools.
3. I found the methodology and discussion parts the most difficult to understand. It was challenging because those sections forced me to think harder to understand the process. Also, there were many technical terms that made it hard to follow the writer’s logic.
4. By reading journal articles, I can improve my writing skills and learn how to write a formal text better. It also helps me understand the right structure for academic writing, so I know how to organize my ideas properly.

April 13, 2026 at 1:14 pm #3814

Keysha
Participant

1. I had an experience reading a journal article about the use of TikTok in learning English. I read it a few weeks ago when I was assigned to find a journal article title. I accessed the article through Google Scholar. I felt interested because the topic matched my own experience learning English with the help of TikTok. However, I also felt confused because some parts used academic language that was difficult to understand.

2. The experience was memorable because the topic was related to my daily life and learning experience. It was also challenging because the article used formal academic language and some unfamiliar research terms.

3. The methodology section is usually the most difficult for me because it contains technical terms and complex explanations about research methods.

4. Reading journal articles helps me understand how to write in academic style, organize ideas clearly, and use appropriate vocabulary. This helps me improve my academic writing skills.
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 37 total)

1 2 3 →

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

INDIVIDUAL EXPLORATION

A. The Importance of Journal Article Publication

In Indonesia, writing and publishing scientific article become one of the prerequisites to get an academic degree. As specified in a circular letter from the Director General of Higher Education issued a circular letter No. 152/E/T/2012 regarding academic publications in obtaining bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral degrees. The importance of research articles has grown since they are crucial in fostering innovation, solving social problems, and contributing to national development (Iskandar, 2020). The Indonesian government has further emphasized the need for quality research output, which is being standardized in all the educational institutions (Widodo, 2019). The increasing focus on academic publications not only contributes to global knowledge but also raises the reputation of Indonesia in terms of academics internationally (Suryani & Ahmad, 2021). In line with this, the Indonesian government has made efforts to increase the productivity and relevance of research both in universities and research institutions (Ristekbrin, 2021). It is known that academics in higher education in Indonesia have the obligation to carry out research and their research results must be published in scientific journals, both national and international (Jannah, 2018; Subekti, 2018; Sugilar et al., 2017; Susanti, 2020). So that academics must have the ability to research and then writing research articles.

In the past five years, universities and other higher education institutions have become the main contributors to research in Indonesia because they have the largest number of experts in science and technology. Based on data from Forlap PDDikti in 2020, there were more than 4,600 higher education institutions, including academies, polytechnics, colleges, institutes, and universities, all of which played an important role in increasing national research output (Dikbud, 2020). However, the quality of research outputs in Indonesia still needs to be improved. The results of previous studies show the importance of the support of private university owners in improving the quality of research (Javed et al., 2020).

Several previous studies have informed a lot about scientific publication solutions carried out by higher education. Among other things, researchers emphasize budgeting for scientific publications of research results (Subekti, 2018; Sugilar et al., 2017). Other researchers emphasize the importance of policy direction and management of scientific publication of research results (Priatna et al., 2020; Sugilar et al., 2017). Some researchers emphasize the importance of cooperation, partnership and collaboration in research and scientific publications (López Pellisa et al., 2020; Maryono & Surajiman, 2017; McMillan et al., 2020;). Some other researchers emphasize the importance of disseminating article writing policies (Triyanto et al., 2020), conducting academic writing workshops (Fadhilaturrahmi et al., 2020; Putra & Saputra, 2019) and article writing training for lecturers and students (Falah, 2019; Fernandez et al., 2020).

In addition, several researchers highlight the importance of writing centers, which are widely established in many leading universities abroad (Bhakta, 2019; Fischer, 2003; Fowler-Amato, 2020; King et al., 2018; North, 1984). These centers are designed to support students in developing their academic writing skills (Tamboli, 2020). They are usually managed by professional staff (Siemann, 2020) and involve academic writing experts who act as coaches (Anderson, 2020; McMurray, 2020). Writing centers also provide practical guides and references to assist students during the learning process (Coit, 2004; Org, 2019). Students can schedule sessions with a coach (Wilder, 2020), where they receive continuous guidance and constructive feedback (Williams, 2004; Bakla, 2020). This feedback process is essential to improving the quality of students’ writing (Bakla, 2020; López-Pellisa et al., 2020; Org, 2019; Samyoun et al., 2020). Moreover, training is delivered through various creative activities (Tremblay-Wragg et al., 2020), helping students not only to practice but also to develop a genuine interest in academic writing (Hayot, 2014; Kiriakos & Tienari, 2018).

B. Exploring Reputable Journals through Journal Finder Tools

In line with this growing emphasis on research quality, Indonesia has implemented a journal classification system known as SINTA, which ranks journals from SINTA 1, the highest, to SINTA 6, the lowest. The Science and Technology Index (SINTA) assesses journal performance based on accreditation and citation standards, indexing national journals accredited by the National Journal Accreditation (ARJUNA-Akreditasi Jurnal Nasional) (Ahmadi, 2019). Reputable journals are those ranked between SINTA 1 and SINTA 3, which generally serve as platforms for high-quality research, while SINTA 4–6 journals are newer publications. This system is intended to maintain research quality while providing a wide range of publication opportunities [Wibisono, 2022]. The increase in quality publications, especially in fields like English Language Teaching (ELT), reflects Indonesia’s progress in academic research.

In addition to national indexing systems, many international journals are indexed in global databases such as Scopus, where journals are categorized into quartiles (Q1–Q4) based on citation impact and academic influence. Understanding journal indexing helps students recognize differences in journal reputation, scope, and scholarly standards.

However, publishing in reputable journals is not only about ranking or citation metrics. It is also closely connected to publication ethics. Publication ethics refers to the principles that ensure honesty, transparency, and responsibility in academic publishing. Ethical publishing practices include the following aspects:

Clear Authorship and Affiliation. Authors must clearly state their names, institutional affiliations, and countries to show academic responsibility and accountability.
proper citation and avoidance of plagiarism. This shows that ideas taken from other scholars are clearly credited, helping to avoid plagiarism.
Complete reference list. All sources cited in the text must appear in the reference list.
Ethics statement/ participant consent. If a study involves human participants (e.g., students, teachers), the article should mention ethical approval or informed consent. This statement is usually found in the Method section.
Acknowledgement/ funding disclosure. Authors should acknowledge financial support or contributions from institutions or individuals.

It is important to note that not all ethical aspects apply to every type of research. Some articles, such as literature reviews or document-based studies, may not involve human participants or external funding. In such cases, certain ethical indicators are marked as Not Applicable (N/A). This does not indicate a weakness; rather, it reflects the nature of the study.

For students, understanding publication ethics is essential because academic writing is not only about producing structured texts, it is about developing integrity as emerging scholars. By examining how published articles present ethical statements, acknowledgements, and citation practices, you learn how responsible research is reported and communicated.

For students, understanding publication ethics is essential because academic writing is not only about producing well-structured texts—it is about developing integrity as emerging scholars. By examining how published articles present ethical statements, acknowledgements, and citation practices, students learn how responsible research is reported and communicated.

Understanding publication ethics helps students to:

avoid plagiarism
cite sources correctly
report research transparently
and prepare academic articles in accordance with journal standards

In this section, you will explore both journal reputation and publication ethics through the use of journal finder tools. Through this exploration, you will learn how to:

match a research topic with an appropriate journal scope,
identify journal indexing and ranking systems,
recognize ethical indicators within published articles, and
reflect on how publication standards shape academic writing practices.

This task is designed to foster independent learning, critical observation, and ethical awareness before engaging in collaborative discussion. By exploring real journal articles, you will not only compare research structures and styles but also understand the ethical foundations that support credible academic publishing.

C. Worksheet 1.2 – Finding and Comparing Two Journal Articles on the Same Topic

Find two journal articles on the same topic in English Education, then compare their structure, style, and research approach.

Part A – Guided Steps: How to Find Journal ArticlesPart B – Article Identification TablePart C - Ethical Indicators in the ArticlePart - D Article Comparison TablePart E – Analytical Reflection

Step 1 – Decide Your Topic

Choose one focused topic in English Education.
Examples:

Technology in EFL classrooms
Students’ motivation in learning English
Peer feedback in academic writing
AI in language learning

Step 2 – Use Academic Search Tools

You may use:

Google Scholar to search for a wide range of academic articles and access abstracts and citations.
Consensus
Chat GPT

Step 3 – Searching Strategy (Follow These Instructions)

Go to the search platform (Google Schoolar or Consensus)
Type your topic using specific keywords.

Example:

“peer feedback in EFL writing classrooms”
“AI tools in English language learning”

3. Read only the title and abstract first.
4. Select two articles that clearly focus on the same topic.

Step 4 – Using AI (ChatGPT) to Support (Not Replace) Your Search

After selecting two articles:

You may ask AI:

“Summarize the research focus of this abstract.”
“What research method is used in this study?”
“Are these two studies investigating the same issue?”

⚠ Important:

Do not copy AI responses.
Use AI only to clarify your understanding.
Always confirm with the original article.

Item	Article 1	Article 2
Title
Author(s)
Year of Publication
Journal Name
Journal Scope
Journal Indexing System
Publisher/ Country
Research focus

Instructions:
Read two selected journal articles. Mark Yes / No / N/A and provide short evidence.

Ethical Aspects	Article 1	Article 2	Notes/Evidence
Clear author affiliation	Yes/No	Yes/No	Institution and country stated?
Proper in-text citations	Yes/No	Yes/No	Sources cited correctly?
Complete reference list	Yes/No	Yes/No	All citations listed?
Ethics statement / consent (if applicable)	Yes/No/N/A	Yes/No/N/A	Ethical approval or participant consent mentioned?
Acknowledgement / funding disclosure	Yes/No	Yes/No	Funding or contributor recognition included?

Complete the table based on your own reading.

Aspects	Article 1	Article 2	Similarity	Differences
Research Problem
Research Objectives
Methodology (Quantitative/Qualitative/Mixed)
Participants
Data Collection Methods
Use of Citations
Strengths
Challenges for Student Readers

Answer in paragraph form:

Which article is easier to understand? Why?
What structural similarities do most academic journal articles share?
What differences did you notice in writing style or research design?
What did you learn about how journal articles are written?
How will this comparison help you write your own academic article?

Authentication required to view this assignment.

SHARING AND DISCUSSION

Scientific article writing is a process that involves many stages, from developing an idea to submitting a manuscript for publication. Each stage requires specific knowledge, skills, and awareness of the expectations set by journals and reviewers. For many students, understanding these stages can be difficult without real-life insights from experienced scholars or journal editors. Therefore, discussing and preparing questions as a group will help students clarify their understanding and focus on what they really want to know about the publication process.

Through group discussion, students have the opportunity to reflect on their own experiences with academic writing and connect them with the challenges of publishing in journals. By working collaboratively, they can generate meaningful questions that not only reflect their curiosity but also guide them toward a deeper understanding of what makes an article publishable. This process also encourages students to think critically, compare perspectives, and learn how to formulate academic inquiries.

The questions developed in this session will serve as the foundation for the upcoming interview with journal editors, reviewers, or lecturers with strong publication experience. This means that the quality of the questions created here will directly influence the depth of insights students can gain in the next stage. Therefore, it is important for each group to take the discussion seriously, explore different angles, and prepare clear and focused questions. This way, the interview will become a valuable learning experience about the realities of scientific publishing.

A. Worksheet 1.3 – Generating Questions on Academic Writing and Journal Publication

This topic has 30 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 3 weeks, 2 days ago by Nayla.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)

1 2 →

Author

Posts
September 3, 2025 at 6:18 am #2565
gunadi.rustian@upi.edu
Keymaster
Instructions
1. Form groups of 3–4 students.
2. Discuss your experiences and knowledge about academic writing and journal article publication.
3. Together, create a list of at least 3 questions for each of the following categories.
4. Remember: The questions you create here will be used in the next meeting for an interview session with journal editors or reviewers, who will share their real experiences about why articles are accepted or rejected.
5. The group leader gives response to the questions and list the name of the group members.
Category 1 – Process

Steps in writing a scientific article

Category 2 – Quality

Characteristics of a high-quality scientific article

Category 3 – Challenges

Common obstacles faced by writers and their solutions

Category 4 – Resources

Support, media, or tools needed for writing

Category 5 – Structure & Content

Main components of a Research Article (RA) in English Language Education
April 21, 2026 at 2:43 am #3840

Sopian
Participant

1. What is the first step students should typically take when they want to write a research paper?
2. How do students choose a good and appropriate topic for a research paper?
3. During the writing process, which part is usually the most difficult for students?
4. In your opinion, what are the characteristics of a good research paper worthy of publication?
5. What makes an article stand out from the rest?
6. How important is the use of the latest references in a scientific article?
7. What are the most common challenges students face when writing a scientific article?
8. How can students overcome difficulties in developing ideas or writing the discussion section?
9. What should students do if their article receives significant revisions from reviewers?
10. What tools or applications do you recommend to help students write scientific articles?
11. Is it important for students to discuss or collaborate with peers or faculty members during the writing process?
12. What are the best reference sources for students?
13. What sections must be included in a research article?
14. How can students write a good and clear abstract?
15. Which section is most frequently written incorrectly by students?

April 21, 2026 at 3:47 am #3842

Sintya
Participant

Group Members:
1. Sintya Naila Salsabila
2. Nenden Jaliah
3. Siti Mariam
4. Asri Nurisma Yuniawati

Questions About Writing an Article
Category 1 – Process
1. When you start writing, which part do you usually work on first?
2. How long does it usually take from the initial idea until the article is finished?
3. After finishing a piece of writing, what do you usually review or check again?

Category 2 – Quality
1. How can we make our writing more credible or trustworthy?
2. What makes a scientific article considered suitable for publication?
3. What are the main aspects that reviewers usually consider when evaluating an article?

Category 3 – Challenges
1. How can we present complex data or theories in a way that is still easy to understand?
2. What are the most common mistakes when writing an article, and how can we avoid them?
3. How do you deal with difficulties in developing ideas or experiencing writer’s block?

Category 4 – Resources
1. What tools or applications are helpful in the process of writing and editing articles?
2. How can we find reliable journals or references?
3. How do writers manage their references to avoid plagiarism?

Category 5 – Structure
1. What makes a good article title?
2. What is the function of an abstract in an article, and how can we write it effectively?
3. What are some things that should be avoided when writing the content of a scientific article?

April 21, 2026 at 4:08 am #3843

Nayla
Participant

Group Members:
1. Nayla Salsabila
2. ⁠Devita Aulia Maulana
3. ⁠Dina Sri Rahayu
4. ⁠Muhammad Fadhil Akbar

5. Process
* How can we create a title that is interesting but still formal?
* How do we make sure our topic is still new and not overused?
* Which part should we start with when turning a thesis into an article?

1. Quality
* Do references have to be recent, or can we use older ones?
* What do lecturers or reviewers usually look at first when deciding whether an article is good and publishable?
* How can we make sure our writing is critical and not just summarizing sources?

1. Challenges
* How can we develop our ideas better so our writing doesn’t feel too shallow?
* If we’re not confident in our writing, should we keep revising?
* Do you have any tips so our citations don’t sound like plagiarism even though we’ve already paraphrased?

1. Resources
* Nowadays there are many predatory journals, what’s the easiest way for students to tell which ones are legit and which ones are not?
* Besides Google Scholar, what platforms are good for finding journals?
* Is it allowed to use AI tools to help improve our English sentence structure?

1. Structure & Content
* In the conclusion, should we honestly mention the limitations of our study, or will that make our article look weak?
* Is the structure of an English article the same as an Indonesian one?
* In the introduction, how can we write a strong opening sentence in English so it immediately catches the editor’s attention?

April 21, 2026 at 4:20 am #3844

Anasya
Participant

Group Members: Anasya Imtina, Aulia Wahdatunisa, Alyaa Mahfudzah, Neng Zaskia

1. Process
– What strategies can help writers stay consistent during the writing process?
– After submitting an article, how long should we usually wait for an update from the editor?
– What factors should be considered when selecting a suitable journal for submission?
– Were there any changes to the initial plan during the process? If so, why?

2. Quality
– What makes a strong and effective introduction section?
– Which is more important: a very new topic (novelty) or very complete data?
– What elements determine whether a paper meets the standard of a high-quality journal?
– What indicators show that article has met the expected standards?

3. Challenges
– How can writers overcome writer’s block effectively?
– What is the most common reason why an article is rejected by reviewers?
– What strategies can help when facing difficulties in writing the discussion section?
– Were there any external factors that affected the completion of article?

4. Resources
– What combination of tools is most effective for beginner researchers?
– Is the use of AI (like ChatGPT) allowed in writing scientific articles?
– What are reliable sources for finding credible academic references?
– How important is using citation tools in avoiding plagiarism?

5. Structure and Content
– What details must be included in the results section?
– How can we write an Abstract that grabs the reader’s attention immediately?
– What common errors should be avoided when writing the conclusion?
– What is the difference between results and discussion?

April 21, 2026 at 4:32 am #3845

Andina
Participant

Group Members
– Andina Ramadhania (24220106)
– Deraya Nurfadila (24220093)
– Indriyani Julianti (24220073)
– Keysha Agatha Meilany (24220008)

Category 1: Process (Steps in Writing Scientific Articles / Langkah-langkah Menulis Artikel Ilmiah)

1. What is the most important first step when starting to write a scientific article?
ID: Apa langkah pertama yang paling penting saat mulai menulis artikel ilmiah?

2. How do writers usually develop a research idea into a publication-ready article?
ID: Bagaimana penulis biasanya mengembangkan ide penelitian menjadi artikel yang siap dipublikasikan?

3. Based on your experience, which step in the scientific writing process is the most challenging?
ID: Berdasarkan pengalaman Anda, langkah mana dalam penulisan artikel ilmiah yang paling sulit bagi penulis?

Category 2: Quality (Characteristics of High-Quality Scientific Articles / Karakteristik Artikel Ilmiah Berkualitas Tinggi)

1. What are the key characteristics of a high-quality scientific article?
ID: Apa saja karakteristik utama dari artikel ilmiah yang berkualitas tinggi?

2. What factors increase the likelihood of an article being accepted by a journal?
ID: Apa yang membuat sebuah artikel lebih besar peluangnya untuk diterima oleh jurnal?

3.How can we determine if our article meets journal standards, such as those of a SINTA 4 journal?
ID: Bagaimana cara mengetahui apakah artikel yang kita tulis sudah memenuhi standar jurnal, seperti jurnal SINTA 4?

Category 3: Challenges (Common Challenges Faced by Authors and Their Solutions / Tantangan Umum Penulis dan Solusinya)

1.What are the most common challenges faced by students or novice researchers?
ID: Apa tantangan yang paling umum dihadapi oleh mahasiswa atau peneliti pemula?

2.How can writers overcome difficulties in writing using academic English?
Bagaimana penulis dapat mengatasi kesulitan dalam menulis bahasa akademik berbahasa Inggris?

3. What advice would you give to writers whose articles have been rejected?
Apa saran yang akan Anda berikan kepada penulis yang artikelnya ditolak?

Category 4: Resources (Support, Media, or Tools Needed in Writing / Dukungan, Media, atau Alat dalam Menulis)

1. What tools or software do you recommend for writing scientific articles?
ID: Alat atau perangkat lunak apa yang Anda rekomendasikan untuk menulis artikel ilmiah?

2. How important is the use of journal databases such as Google Scholar or Scopus?
ID: Seberapa penting penggunaan database jurnal seperti Google Scholar atau Scopus?

3. What kind of support do novice writers need to improve their writing skills?
ID: Dukungan seperti apa yang dibutuhkan penulis pemula untuk meningkatkan keterampilan menulis mereka?

Category 5: Structure & Content (Structure and Content of Scientific Articles / Struktur dan Isi Artikel Ilmiah)

1. Which part of a scientific article is the most critical for a reviewer’s assessment?
ID: Bagian mana dari artikel ilmiah yang paling krusial bagi penilaian seorang reviewer?

2. What are the common mistakes writers often make when structuring their manuscript?
ID: Kesalahan umum apa yang sering dilakukan penulis dalam menyusun naskah mereka?

3. What specific advice would you give to make the introduction and discussion sections more compelling?
ID: Saran spesifik apa yang akan Anda berikan untuk membuat bagian pendahuluan dan pembahasan menjadi lebih kuat/menarik?

April 21, 2026 at 4:37 am #3846

Sopian
Participant

Group Members:
1. Malik Muhamad Ghofur
2. Muhammad sopian
3. Rofiq Muwahid

Category 1 – Process
1. What is the first step students should typically take when they want to write a research paper?
2. How do students choose a good and appropriate topic for a research paper?
3. During the writing process, which part is usually the most difficult for students?
Category 2 – Quality
1. In your opinion, what are the characteristics of a good research paper worthy of publication?
2. What makes an article stand out from the rest?
3. How important is the use of the latest references in a scientific article?
Category 3 – Challenges
1. What are the most common challenges students face when writing a scientific article?
2. How can students overcome difficulties in developing ideas or writing the discussion section?
3. What should students do if their article receives significant revisions from reviewers?
Category 4 – Resources
1. What tools or applications do you recommend to help students write scientific articles?
2. Is it important for students to discuss or collaborate with peers or faculty members during the writing process?
3. What are the best reference sources for students?
Category 5 – Structure
1. What sections must be included in a research article?
2. How can students write a good and clear abstract?
3. Which section is most frequently written incorrectly by students?

April 21, 2026 at 4:43 am #3847

Nur
Participant

Group Members:
1.Alya.L
2.Ghaida.S
3.Hana.F
4.Nur Siti.F

Category 1: Process
1. What is the order of precedence when creating a journal?
2. How is journal publishing performed using syntax?
3. What are the main requirements for publishing an article?

Category 2: Quality
1. What are the differences between syntax 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5?
2. What is an example of a good journal?
3. Do all articles have the same standards for publication, or do they vary?

Category 3: Resources
1. Can English journals use references from Indonesian journals?
2. Are there any reference restrictions?
3. Is there a minimum year requirement for references?

Category 4: Structure
1. Is the format appropriate for the paper?
2. What is the proper format for writing journal articles?3.
3. What is the minimum word count for a journal article title?

Category 5: Content
1. The difference between journals and articles?
2. What is the most important factor in determining whether an article is accepted or not, content or format?
3. How to choose the right keywords?

April 21, 2026 at 4:54 am #3848

Mutia
Participant

Group Members :
Aidha P. Azzahra S. (24220118)
Hasni Melisa Putri (24220098)
Mutia Rahmawati (24220085)
Nadifa Rheihan Nisa (24220133)

1. How we make a reference list (daftar pustaka) if we input a citation, but based on an existed someone else’s journal?
2. How to make a proper background based on the title’s variable?
3. How many types of journal? We saw that there is a citation that written in the small paragraph at the end of the page, and in the paragraph itself?
4. If there are more than a type of journal, then what is the difference between those two styles of citation?
5. What is the difference between the background and at the end of the journal?
6. Is there any way to look for reliable sources for our journal besides Google Schoolar?
7. How do we can prove the validity or authenticity of the recources/citation we use in our journal?
8. How do we make a proper conclusion without writing unncessary repetition?
9. How to make citation based on another journal without being categorized as plagiarism?
10. Why do students struggling to write journal or research paper?
11. What is the first step before we write journal or research paper?
12. What is the difference between APA style and MLA style?
13. Should we make a citation if we inspired from some of sentences from another journal in our introduction?
14. What is the minimun and maximum age of journal for us to cite a journal?
15. Is it possible for us to write a journal in Indonesian Language first the translate it all to English after that? Or do we need to write in English in the first place?

April 21, 2026 at 5:33 am #3849

Sania
Participant

Name of The Group Members:
• Rizki Ahmad
• Nisrina Jaatsiyah
• Sania Buchori M
• Yefi Medriana

Process
1. How do researchers usually get started when they decide to turn their study into a scientific article?
2. In what ways does peer review shape or change the article before it gets published?
3. How do researchers usually handle tight deadlines when preparing their manuscripts?

Quality
1. How can researchers ensure the reliability and validity of their scientific article?
2. What role does originality play in determining the quality of a scientific article?
3. How do citation practices reflect the credibility of a scientific article?

Challenges
1. What are the most frequent challenges writers face when organizing ideas in scientific article, and how can they overcome them?
2. How do issues like limited vocabulary or lack of clarity affect the quality of scientific article?
3. Why do many writers struggle with proper citation and referencing, and what strategies can help improve this skill?

Resources
1. What are the stages of developing an academic article from the selection of the topic to the final edit?
2. Why is it vital to use reliable sources when writing an academic article, and how can one get them?
3. In what ways can you use reference sources within your article to make your argument stronger and ensure the article’s structure?

Structure & content
1. What are the main components of a research article in English Language Education, and what is the purpose of each section?
2. How does the structure of the introduction, literature review, and methodology contribute to the overall clarity of a research article?
3. Why is it important to present results and discussion sections clearly and systematically in a research article?

April 21, 2026 at 6:05 am #3850

Avada
Participant

Group Members :
1. Anggita Dwi Mayani
2. Avada Alya S. N.
3. Laili Humairoh
4. Shifa Aulia R.

– *Process*
1. Bagaimana alur proses dalam publikasi artikel dalam jurnal? dari tahap awal sampai akhir
2. aspek apa yang biasanya pertama kali diperiksa oleh editor pada tahap desk evaluation?
3. ⁠dalam proses peer review, kriteria apa saja yang menjadi pertimbangan utama peninjau dalam menilai kelayakan artikel?

– *Quality*
1. ⁠seberapa besar pengaruh tingkat kesamaan atau indikasi plagiat dalam keputusan penolakan artikel
2. ⁠kelemahan apa yang sering ditemukan pada metodologi penelitan artikel yang akhirnya di tolak?
3. ⁠seberapa penting unsur kebaruan dan kontribusi ilmiah dalam menentukan artikel layak dipublikasikan atau tidak?

– *Challenges*
1. ⁠kesalahan apa yang sering dilakukan penulis pemula ketika mengirimkan artikel ke jurnal?
2. ⁠apakah perbedaan dalam template atau panduan penulis sering menjadi alasan jurnal langsung ditolak?
3. ⁠berdasarkan pengalaman bapak ibu, faktor apa yang sering menyebabkan artikel gagal publis?

– *Resource*
1. ⁠Apa persyaratan utama yang harus di penuhi penulis sebelum mengirimkan artikel ke jurnal?
2. ⁠jika bapak ibu berkesempatan memberikan saran bagi para peneliti pemula, apa yang harus diperhatikan agar peluang publikasi menjadi lebih besar?
3. Bagaimana cara memilih jurnal yang tepat berdasarkan scope dan indexing yang tersedia?

– *Structure and content*
1. Seberapa penting kesesuaian topik artikel dan scope jurnal dalam proses seleksi awal?
2. Apa saja indikator yang digunakan untuk menentukan bahwa suatu artikel tidak sesuai dengan scope jurnal?
3. Bagaimana strategi yang dapat dilakukan penulis untuk menyesuaikan isi artikel dengan scope jurnal yang dituju?

April 21, 2026 at 6:09 am #3851

Dhiwa
Participant

Member of group:
Daffa
Dhiwa
Eko
Rafli

Category 1 Process
1. After finding a topic, what next steps should be consider? Should we start the introduction right away, or we need to prepare something first?
2. Should the abstract be written after the discussion section, or only once the references section has been fully completed?
3. What are the steps or methods for determining which research method is suitable for the topic that has been determined?

Category 2
1. What form of scientific article is considered to be of high quality?
2.Why is the use of valid data very important in determining the quality of a scientific article?
3.How do authors keep their scientific articles clear, structured, and easy for readers to understand?

Category 3 Challenges
1. At what stage do you most often encounter challenges when writing an article?
2. How often do you have difficulty choosing the most appropriate and valid methodology to answer your research questions?
3. How can you avoid plagiarism in journal articles?

Category 4
1. What tools or resources are used to assist in writing articles, and how can they be used most effectively?
2. How can AI help improve the quality of article writing?
3. How to maximize the use of references in using Mendeley in compiling a bibliography

Category 5
1. What is the difference in function between the “Results” and “Discussion” sections, and why should these two sections not be mixed?
2. What are common mistakes when writing the conclusion of an article?
3. How are the Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion sections interconnected in creating a coherent article?

April 21, 2026 at 6:26 am #3852

Avada
Participant

Group Members :
1. Anggita Dwi Mayani
2. Avada Alya S. N.
3. Laili Humairoh
4. Shifa Aulia R.

– Process
1. Bagaimana alur proses dalam publikasi artikel dalam jurnal? dari tahap awal sampai akhir
2. aspek apa yang biasanya pertama kali diperiksa oleh editor pada tahap desk evaluation?
3. ⁠dalam proses peer review, kriteria apa saja yang menjadi pertimbangan utama peninjau dalam menilai kelayakan artikel?

– Quality
1. ⁠seberapa besar pengaruh tingkat kesamaan atau indikasi plagiat dalam keputusan penolakan artikel?
2. ⁠kelemahan apa yang sering ditemukan pada metodologi penelitan artikel yang akhirnya di tolak?
3. ⁠seberapa penting unsur kebaruan dan kontribusi ilmiah dalam menentukan artikel layak dipublikasikan atau tidak?

– Challenges
1. ⁠kesalahan apa yang sering dilakukan penulis pemula ketika mengirimkan artikel ke jurnal?
2. ⁠apakah perbedaan dalam template atau panduan penulis sering menjadi alasan jurnal langsung ditolak?
3. ⁠berdasarkan pengalaman ibu, faktor apa yang sering menyebabkan artikel gagal publis?

– Resource
1. ⁠Apa persyaratan utama yang harus di penuhi penulis sebelum mengirimkan artikel ke jurnal?
2. ⁠jika ibu berkesempatan memberikan saran bagi para peneliti pemula, apa yang harus diperhatikan agar peluang publikasi menjadi lebih besar?
3. Bagaimana cara memilih jurnal yang tepat berdasarkan scope dan indexing yang tersedia?

– Structure and content
1. Seberapa penting kesesuaian topik artikel dan scope jurnal dalam proses seleksi awal?
2. Apa saja indikator yang digunakan untuk menentukan bahwa suatu artikel tidak sesuai dengan scope jurnal?
3. Bagaimana strategi yang dapat dilakukan penulis untuk menyesuaikan isi artikel dengan scope jurnal yang dituju?

April 21, 2026 at 6:33 am #3853

Ghaida
Participant

GROUP MEMBERS:
1. GHAIDA SALSABILA A
2. ALYA LUTFIYATUNNISA
3. NUR SITI FADILAH
4. HANA FAUZIAH

Category 1: Process
* What is the order of preparation for a journal?
* How is journal publishing performed using syntax?
* What are the main requirements for publishing an article?

Category 2: Quality
* What are the differences between syntax 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5?
* What is an example of a good journal?
* Do all articles have the same standards for publication, or do they vary?

Category 3: Challenges
* Is there a publication fee?
* What are the difficulties faced in avoiding plagiarism when writing articles?
* What are the difficulties in grammatical structure?

Category 4: Resources
* Can English journals use references from Indonesian journals?
* Is there a reference limit?
* Is there a minimum year requirement for references?

Category 5: Structure and Content
* The difference between journals and articles?
* What is the most important factor in determining whether an article is accepted or not, content or format?
* What is the correct format for writing journal articles?

April 21, 2026 at 6:47 am #3855

Hasni
Participant

Aidha P. Azzahra S. (24220118)
Hasni Melisa Putri (24220098)
Mutia Rahmawati (24220085)
Nadifa Rheihan Nisa (24220133)
Academic Writing
Process:
1. Bagaimana cara membuat latar belakang yang baik berdasarkan variabel di judul?
2. Kalau nulis jurnal dalam bahasa Indonesia terus di translate ke Inggris itu bisa atau ngga? Apa harus dari awal kalimat yang di susun itu dari Bahasa apInggris?
3. Apakah abstrak disusun terakhir?
Quality:
1. Bagaimana cara kita membuktikan kalau sitasi yang diambil itu valid?
2. Apakah ada perbedaan kualitas jurnal yang dibaca berdasarkan bahasa? Misalnya, mau bikin jurnal dalam Bahasa Inggris, tapi kita baca referensi Bahasa Indonesia?
3. Apa faktor yang bikin validity atau quality sebuah jurnal dipertanyakan?
Challenges:
1. Faktor apa yang bikin mahasiswa kesulitan menyusun jurnal?
Resources:
1. Kalo mau ngutip kalimat di salah satu jurnal tapi itu juga kutipan orang dari jurnal lain, gimana menyusun daftar pustakanya gimana?
2. Kalau mau ngutip dari jurnal atau buku ada maksimal berapa tahun nya ga? Misalnya harus 5 tahun kebelakang.
3. Dalam satu bagian, minimal ada berapa sitasi yang harus dipakai?
Structure Content:
1. Ada berapa kah versi jurnal? Ada yang referencenya di setiap bagian bawah halaman (kutipan di paragrafnya pake angka pangkat kecil) ada juga yang di daftar pustaka kutipan di paragraf biasa (Nina, 2026)
2. Apa bedanya pembahasan di latar belakang dan di hasil dan pembahasan?
3. Apa bedanya APA dan MLA style?
Author

Posts

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 16 total)

1 2 →

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

DRAFTING AND REFINING

After each group uploads the 15 questions developed in the previous stage, this stage focuses on expert validation and refinement. The primary goal is to ensure that the questions are appropriate, relevant, and professionally framed for submission to journal editors, reviewers, or lecturers with expertise in academic publication.

At this stage, the lecturer reviews all 15 questions from each group and evaluates whether they meet the standards of clarity, focus, relevance, and ethical appropriateness required in academic publishing contexts. The lecturer then provides written and/or oral feedback, including suggestions for rewording, narrowing the focus, or removing questions that are redundant or unsuitable.

Based on the lecturer’s feedback, each group is required to revise their questions. Only questions that have been approved by the lecturer are considered ready for use in the subsequent Interview stage. This validation process ensures that the questions are not merely discussion-oriented but are academically sound and suitable for professional communication with editors and reviewers.

A. Worksheet 1.4 – Refining and Finalizing Interview Questions

This topic has 11 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 1 week, 4 days ago by Nisrina.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

Author

Posts
September 15, 2025 at 1:35 pm #3022
gunadi.rustian@upi.edu
Keymaster
Instructions
1. Transfer your group’s 15 questions from Worksheet 1.3 into this worksheet.
2. The lecturer reviews each question and provides feedback regarding:
  - clarity of wording,
  - relevance to scientific article writing and publication, and
  - suitability for asking editors, reviewers, or publication experts.
3. Revise each question based on the lecturer’s suggestions.
4. Mark the revised question with a ✔️ once it has been validated by the lecturer and is ready to be used in the upcoming Interview stage.
April 21, 2026 at 2:44 am #3841

Sopian
Participant

1. What is the first step students should typically take when they want to write a research paper?
2. How do students choose a good and appropriate topic for a research paper?
3. During the writing process, which part is usually the most difficult for students?
4. In your opinion, what are the characteristics of a good research paper worthy of publication?
5. What makes an article stand out from the rest?
6. How important is the use of the latest references in a scientific article?
7. What are the most common challenges students face when writing a scientific article?
8. How can students overcome difficulties in developing ideas or writing the discussion section?
9. What should students do if their article receives significant revisions from reviewers?
10. What tools or applications do you recommend to help students write scientific articles?
11. Is it important for students to discuss or collaborate with peers or faculty members during the writing process?
12. What are the best reference sources for students?
13. What sections must be included in a research article?
14. How can students write a good and clear abstract?
15. Which section is most frequently written incorrectly by students?

April 23, 2026 at 12:43 pm #3856

Sintya
Participant

Group Members:
1. Sintya Naila Salsabila
2. Nenden Jaliah
3. Siti Mariam
4. Asri Nurisma Yuniawati

Questions About Writing an Article
Category 1 – Process
1. When you start writing, which part do you usually work on first?
2. How long does it usually take from the initial idea until the article is finished?
3. After finishing a piece of writing, what do you usually review or check again?

Category 2 – Quality
1. How can we make our writing more credible or trustworthy?
2. What makes a scientific article considered suitable for publication?
3. What are the main aspects that reviewers usually consider when evaluating an article?

Category 3 – Challenges
1. How can we present complex data or theories in a way that is still easy to understand?
2. What are the most common mistakes when writing an article, and how can we avoid them?
3. How do you deal with difficulties in developing ideas or experiencing writer’s block?

Category 4 – Resources
1. What tools or applications are helpful in the process of writing and editing articles?
2. How can we find reliable journals or references?
3. How do writers manage their references to avoid plagiarism?

Category 5 – Structure
1. What makes a good article title?
2. What is the function of an abstract in an article, and how can we write it effectively?
3. What are some things that should be avoided when writing the content of a scientific article?

April 23, 2026 at 2:29 pm #3857

Hasni
Participant

Aidha P. Azzahra S. (24220118)
Hasni Melisa Putri (24220098)
Mutia Rahmawati (24220085)
Nadifa Rheihan Nisa (24220133)

Academic Writing

Process:
1. Bagaimana cara membuat latar belakang yang baik berdasarkan variabel di judul?
2. Kalau nulis jurnal dalam bahasa Indonesia terus di translate ke Inggris itu bisa atau ngga? Apa harus dari awal kalimat yang di susun itu dari Bahasa apInggris?
3. Apakah abstrak disusun terakhir?

Quality:
1. Bagaimana cara kita membuktikan kalau sitasi yang diambil itu valid?
2. Apakah ada perbedaan kualitas jurnal yang dibaca berdasarkan bahasa? Misalnya, mau bikin jurnal dalam Bahasa Inggris, tapi kita baca referensi Bahasa Indonesia?
3. Apa ada faktor lain yang bikin validity atau quality sebuah jurnal dipertanyakan?

Challenges:
1. Bagian apa yang paling sulit ditulis kebanyakan mahasiswa?
2. Bagaimana cara menghadapi dan menyelesaikan grammatical error?

Resources:
1. Kalo mau ngutip kalimat di salah satu jurnal tapi itu juga kutipan orang dari jurnal lain, gimana menyusun daftar pustakanya gimana?
2. Kalau mau ngutip dari jurnal atau buku ada maksimal berapa tahun nya ga? Misalnya harus 5 tahun kebelakang.
3. Dalam satu bagian, minimal ada berapa sitasi yang harus dipakai?

Structure Content:
1. Ada berapa kah versi penulisan referencenya? Karena ada di setiap bagian bawah halaman (kutipan di paragrafnya pake angka pangkat kecil) ada juga yang di daftar pustaka kutipan di paragraf biasa (Nina, 2026)
2. Apa bedanya pembahasan di latar belakang dan di hasil dan pembahasan?
3. Apa bedanya APA dan MIA style?

April 25, 2026 at 3:18 pm #3859

Keysha
Participant

– Andina Ramadhania (24220106)
– Deraya Nurfadila (24220093)
– Indriyani Julianti (24220073)
– Keysha Agatha Meilany (24220008)

category 1: Process
3. Based on your experience, which step in the scientific writing process is the most challenging?
ID: Berdasarkan pengalaman Anda, langkah mana dalam penulisan artikel ilmiah yang paling sulit bagi penulis?

Category 2: Quality
3.How can we determine if our article meets journal standards, such as those of a SINTA 4 journal?
ID: Bagaimana cara mengetahui apakah artikel yang kita tulis sudah memenuhi standar jurnal, seperti jurnal SINTA 4?

Category 3: Challenges
2.How can writers overcome difficulties in writing using academic English?
Bagaimana penulis dapat mengatasi kesulitan dalam menulis bahasa akademik berbahasa Inggris?
3. What advice would you give to writers whose articles have been rejected?
ID: Apa saran yang akan Anda berikan kepada penulis yang artikelnya ditolak?

Category 4: Resources
3. What kind of support do novice writers need to improve their writing skills?
ID: Dukungan seperti apa yang dibutuhkan penulis pemula untuk meningkatkan keterampilan menulis mereka?

Category 5: Structure & Content
1. Which part of a scientific article is the most critical for a reviewer’s assessment?
ID: Bagian mana dari artikel ilmiah yang paling krusial bagi penilaian seorang reviewer?

April 26, 2026 at 4:01 am #3862

Anggita
Participant

-Anggita Dwi Mayani
-Avada Alya S
-Laili Humairoh
-Shifa Aulia R

– Process
1. What is the process for publishing an article in a journal? From the initial stage to the final stage.
2. What aspects are usually reviewed first by editors during the desk evaluation stage?
3. In the peer review process, what criteria are reviewers’ primary considerations when assessing the suitability of an article?

– Quality
4. What weaknesses are often found in the research methodology of articles that ultimately lead to their rejection?

– Challenges
5. What mistakes do novice authors often make when submitting articles to journals?
6. Are differences in templates or author guidelines often the reason for journals’ outright rejection?
7. Based on your experience, what factors often cause articles to fail to be published?

– Resources
8. What are the main requirements authors must meet before submitting an article to a journal?
9. If you have the opportunity to offer advice to novice researchers, what should they consider to increase their chances of publication?

– Structure and content
10. What indicators are used to determine whether an article does not fit the journal’s scope?

April 26, 2026 at 7:03 pm #3866

Alya
Participant

GROUP MEMBERS:
1. GHAIDA SALSABILA A
2. ALYA LUTFIYATUNNISA
3. NUR SITI FADILAH
4. HANA FAUZIAH

1. Bagaimana urutan penulisan artikel ilmiah?
2. Boleh tidak dalam pembuatan artikel bahasa Inggris mengambil referensi dari artikel bahasa Indonesia?
3. Apakah ada batasan referensi?
4. Berapa minimal jumlah kata?
5. Apa faktor utama artikel lolos publish atau tidak?
6. Bagaimana cara memilih keyword yang tepat pada penulisan artikel?

April 27, 2026 at 3:42 am #3868

Anasya
Participant

Group Members: Anasya Imtina M, Alyaa Mahfudzah, Aulia Wahdatun Nissa, Neng Zaskiya

Process
– What strategies can help writers stay consistent during the writing process?
– After submitting an article, how long should we usually wait for an update from the editor?
– What factors should be considered when selecting a suitable journal for submission?

Quality
– Which is more important: a very new topic (novelty) or very complete data?
– What elements determine whether a paper meets the standard of a high-quality journal?

Challenges
– What is the most common reason why an article is rejected by reviewers?
– What strategies can help when facing difficulties in writing the discussion section?

Resources
– What are reliable sources for finding credible academic references?

Structure and Content
– How can we write an Abstract that grabs the reader’s attention immediately?
– What common errors should be avoided when writing the conclusion?

April 27, 2026 at 11:50 am #3889

Sopian
Participant

Group Members:
– malik muhamad Ghofur
– Muhammad Sopian
– Rofiq Muwahid

Category 1 – Process
1. What is the first step students should typically take when they want to write a research paper?
2. How do students choose a good and appropriate topic for a research paper?
3. During the writing process, which part is usually the most difficult for students?
Category 2 – Quality
1. In your opinion, what are the characteristics of a good research paper worthy of publication?
2. What makes an article stand out from the rest?
3. What are the best reference sources for students?
Category 5 – Structure
1. What sections must be included in a research article?
3. Which section is most frequently written incorrectly by students?

April 27, 2026 at 12:57 pm #3891

Dhiwa
Participant

Member Group:
Daffa
Dhiwa
Eko
Rafli

1. Setelah menentukan topik, langkah apa saja yang harus dipertimbangkan selanjutnya? Apakah kita harus langsung menulis bagian pendahuluan, atau perlu mempersiapkan sesuatu terlebih dahulu?
2. Apa saja langkah atau metode untuk menentukan metode penelitian mana yang sesuai dengan topik yang telah ditentukan?
3. Bagaimana cara menghindari plagiarisme dalam menulis artikel jurnal?
4. Bagaimana AI dapat membantu meningkatkan kualitas penulisan artikel?
5. Bagaimana cara memaksimalkan penggunaan referensi dengan menggunakan Mendeley dalam menyusun daftar pustaka?
6. Apa perbedaan fungsi antara bagian “Hasil” dan “Pembahasan”, dan mengapa kedua bagian ini tidak boleh dicampur?

May 9, 2026 at 2:00 pm #4033

Nisrina
Participant

Anggota:

• Rizki Ahmad
• Nisrina Jaatsiyah
• Sania Buchori M
• Yefi Medriana

1. Apa langkah pertama seorang ilmuwan dalam mengubah temuan penelitian menjadi artikel yang dapat dipublikasikan?
2. Dengan cara apa proses review sejawat menjadi elemen pengendalian kualitas dalam publikasi ilmiah?
3. Alat apa yang digunakan peneliti untuk menyeimbangkan persiapan naskah ilmiah dengan batasan waktu?
4. Metode apa yang terbaik bagi ilmuwan dalam menjaga keseimbangan data yang valid dan andal?
5. Mengapa keberadaan ide-ide baru sangat krusial untuk keunggulan akademik sebuah artikel?
6. Apa yang dilakukan penggunaan yang tepat dari kutipan dan referensi terhadap sebuah artikel ilmiah?
7. Bagaimana penulis mengembangkan ide untuk artikel ilmiah dan apa tantangan paling signifikan yang mereka temui?
8. Bagaimana kurangnya kejelasan dalam penulisan dan vokabularis akademik yang terbatas mengendalikan keunggulan artikel ilmiah?
9. Mengapa kurangnya penggunaan kutipan dan referensi yang tepat adalah tantangan umum bagi penulis, dan bagaimana tantangan tersebut dapat diatasi?
10. Pengembangan artikel akademik adalah proses berfase. Apa saja tahap utama dari proses ini mulai dari memilih topik hingga editing?
11. Kriteria apa yang digunakan untuk memilih sumber yang dapat diandalkan, dan bagaimana keberadaan sumber tersebut dibenarkan?
12. Bagaimana cara paling efektif mengintegrasikan sumber ke dalam penulisan akademik untuk memperkuat argumen Anda, dan bagaimana menyusun argumentasi secara paling efektif sesuai dengan tata letak artikel?
13. Apa fitur utama dari artikel penelitian dalam pendidikan?
14.Jelaskan setiap kontribusi dari bagian-bagian ini terhadap kejelasan artikel penelitian: pendahuluan, tinjauan pustaka, dan metodologi.
15.Mengapa bagian hasil dan diskusi dalam artikel penelitian harus disajikan secara jelas dan sistematis?
Author

Posts

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

ASSIGNMENT

In this assignment, each group will conduct a field interview with a journal editor, reviewer, or lecturer who has extensive publication experience.

This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 weeks, 1 day ago by Hasni.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Author

Posts
September 14, 2025 at 12:02 pm #2930
gunadi.rustian@upi.edu
Keymaster
Purpose

The purpose of this activity is to help students gain deeper understanding of the publication process by exploring the expectations, challenges, resources, and evaluation criteria that are commonly applied in reviewing scientific articles.

Instructions
1. Prepare a set of interview questions based on the following categories:
  - Process: Steps in writing and submitting a scientific article.
  - Quality: Characteristics of a high-quality scientific article.
  - Challenges: Common obstacles faced by authors during writing and submission.
  - Resources: Support, tools, or resources needed for writing.
  - Structure & Content: Main components that must be included in a research article.
2. Arrange a schedule and conduct the interview in a professional manner.
3. Take detailed notes during the interview, highlighting important advice, suggestions, and observations.
4. Summarize the findings by identifying patterns, recurring feedback, and practical recommendations.
Assignment Report

Each group submits a written report that includes:
1. Key insights from editors or reviewers.
2. Frequent challenges faced by authors.
3. Recommended resources and support for improving scientific writing.
4. Suggestions for improving manuscript clarity, structure, and content.
April 21, 2026 at 6:45 am #3854

Hasni
Participant

Aidha P. Azzahra S. (24220118)
Hasni Melisa Putri (24220098)
Mutia Rahmawati (24220085)
Nadifa Rheihan Nisa (24220133)
Academic Writing
Process:
1. Bagaimana cara membuat latar belakang yang baik berdasarkan variabel di judul?
2. Kalau nulis jurnal dalam bahasa Indonesia terus di translate ke Inggris itu bisa atau ngga? Apa harus dari awal kalimat yang di susun itu dari Bahasa apInggris?
3. Apakah abstrak disusun terakhir?
Quality:
1. Bagaimana cara kita membuktikan kalau sitasi yang diambil itu valid?
2. Apakah ada perbedaan kualitas jurnal yang dibaca berdasarkan bahasa? Misalnya, mau bikin jurnal dalam Bahasa Inggris, tapi kita baca referensi Bahasa Indonesia?
3. Apa faktor yang bikin validity atau quality sebuah jurnal dipertanyakan?
Challenges:
1. Faktor apa yang bikin mahasiswa kesulitan menyusun jurnal?
Resources:
1. Kalo mau ngutip kalimat di salah satu jurnal tapi itu juga kutipan orang dari jurnal lain, gimana menyusun daftar pustakanya gimana?
2. Kalau mau ngutip dari jurnal atau buku ada maksimal berapa tahun nya ga? Misalnya harus 5 tahun kebelakang.
3. Dalam satu bagian, minimal ada berapa sitasi yang harus dipakai?
Structure Content:
1. Ada berapa kah versi jurnal? Ada yang referencenya di setiap bagian bawah halaman (kutipan di paragrafnya pake angka pangkat kecil) ada juga yang di daftar pustaka kutipan di paragraf biasa (Nina, 2026)
2. Apa bedanya pembahasan di latar belakang dan di hasil dan pembahasan?
3. Apa bedanya APA dan MLA style?
Author

Posts